Rutgers University, Department of Psychology, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Behav Brain Res. 2011 Oct 1;223(2):297-309. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.050. Epub 2011 May 6.
"General intelligence" is purported to influence diverse domain-specific learning abilities in humans, and previous research indicates that an analogous trait is expressed in CD-1 outbred mice. In humans and mice, exploratory tendencies are predictive of general cognitive abilities, such that higher cognitive abilities are associated with elevated levels of exploration. However, in mice, repeated exposure to novel environments outside the home cage has been found to up-regulate exploratory tendencies but has no commensurate effect on general learning abilities, suggesting that exploratory tendencies do not causally influence general cognitive performance. This leaves open the question of what is responsible for the robust relationship observed between exploration and general learning abilities? In the present experiments, we find that differential rates of habituation (e.g., to a novel open field) between animals of high and low general learning abilities accounts for the relationship between exploration and learning abilities. First, we up-regulated exploration by exposing mice to a series of novel environments. Similar to its lack of effect on learning tasks, this up-regulation of exploration had no commensurate effect on habituation to novel objects or stimuli. Next we examined the relationship between general learning abilities and exploration under conditions where habituation had a high or low impact on exploratory behaviors. A strong correlation between general learning abilities and exploration was observed under conditions where the levels of habituation (to a novel object or an open field) between animals of high and low general learning abilities were allowed to vary. However, this same correlation was attenuated when the level of habituation attained by animals of high and low general learning abilities was asymptotic or held constant across animals. In total, these results indicate that the relationship between exploration and general learning abilities is accounted for by the impact of habituation (itself a form of learning) on behaviors indicative of exploration.
“一般智力”被认为会影响人类在不同领域的特定学习能力,先前的研究表明,类似的特征在 CD-1 近交系小鼠中表现出来。在人类和小鼠中,探索倾向可以预测一般认知能力,因此更高的认知能力与更高的探索水平相关。然而,在小鼠中,反复暴露于家笼外的新环境中会增加探索倾向,但对一般学习能力没有相应的影响,这表明探索倾向不会对一般认知表现产生因果影响。这就提出了一个问题,是什么导致了探索和一般学习能力之间观察到的强大关系?在本实验中,我们发现,具有高和低一般学习能力的动物之间的习惯化率(例如,对新开阔地的习惯化)的差异解释了探索和学习能力之间的关系。首先,我们通过将小鼠暴露于一系列新环境中来增加探索。与对学习任务没有影响类似,这种探索的增加对新物体或刺激的习惯化没有相应的影响。接下来,我们在习惯化对探索行为有高或低影响的情况下,检查了一般学习能力与探索之间的关系。在高和低一般学习能力的动物之间的习惯化(对新物体或开阔地)水平允许变化的情况下,观察到一般学习能力和探索之间存在很强的相关性。然而,当高和低一般学习能力的动物达到的习惯化水平或在动物之间保持恒定时,这种相关性就减弱了。总的来说,这些结果表明,探索和一般学习能力之间的关系是由习惯化(本身也是一种学习)对探索行为的影响所决定的。