Suppr超能文献

以模拟人体给药的方式,在高度耐青霉素肺炎链球菌肺炎兔模型中比较头孢曲松和头孢噻肟的疗效。

Ceftaroline versus ceftriaxone in a highly penicillin-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia rabbit model using simulated human dosing.

机构信息

Infectious Diseases Laboratory, University Hospital, Dijon, France.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Jul;55(7):3557-63. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01773-09. Epub 2011 May 16.

Abstract

Ceftaroline (CPT) is a new cephalosporin exhibiting bactericidal activity against Gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (MDRSP), as well as common Gram-negative pathogens. This study investigated the in vivo efficacy of a 48-hour simulated human dose regimen of CPT compared with ceftriaxone (CRO) against isolates of S. pneumoniae with different susceptibilities to penicillin in a rabbit pneumonia model. Three S. pneumoniae strains were used: CRO-susceptible penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae (CRO-S PSSP), CRO-susceptible penicillin-intermediate S. pneumoniae (CRO-S PISP), and CRO-resistant penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (CRO-R PRSP). Animals were randomized to the control group (no treatment) (n = 22) or to a group given intravenous (IV) CPT human equivalent (HE) dosage (600 mg/12 h; n = 19) or IV CRO HE dosage (1 g/24 h; n = 19). The total doses needed to achieve the HE dosage were 71 and 82 mg/kg of body weight/24 h for CRO and CPT, respectively. One group of rabbits infected with the CRO-R PRSP strain received intramuscular (IM) administration of CPT (5 or 20 mg/kg twice daily; n = 5 for each). Evaluation of efficacy was based on bacterial counts in the lungs and spleen. For IV CPT and IV CRO, the mean areas under the concentration-time curves from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)s) were 155 and 938 mg · h/liter, respectively, the maximum concentrations in serum (C(max)s) were 20 and 158 mg/liter, respectively, and the minimum concentrations in serum (C(min)s) were 1.3 and 6 mg/liter, respectively. Both agents effectively treated pulmonary infections caused by CRO-S PSSP or CRO-S PISP with complete bacterial eradication in the lungs and spleen after 2 days of treatment. Against PRSP, CPT demonstrated excellent bactericidal activity, reducing bacterial counts in the lungs and spleen by approximately 8 and 4 log units, respectively (P < 0.001); CRO treatment resulted in a 2-log-unit reduction in the bacterial counts in lungs that did not reach statistical significance. Twice-daily IM CPT (5 mg/kg) reduced the bacterial burden by approximately 6 log units in the lungs and 3 log units in the spleen, and the 20-mg/kg dosage effectively eradicated PRSP infection. These findings further validate the in vivo bactericidal activity of CPT against pneumococci.

摘要

头孢他啶(CPT)是一种新型头孢菌素,对革兰氏阳性菌具有杀菌作用,包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和多药耐药肺炎链球菌(MDRSP)以及常见的革兰氏阴性病原体。本研究在兔肺炎模型中,比较了 48 小时模拟人体剂量的 CPT 与头孢曲松(CRO)对不同青霉素敏感性的肺炎链球菌分离株的体内疗效。使用了三种肺炎链球菌菌株:CRO-敏感青霉素敏感肺炎链球菌(CRO-S PSSP)、CRO-敏感青霉素中介肺炎链球菌(CRO-S PISP)和 CRO-耐药青霉素耐药肺炎链球菌(CRO-R PRSP)。动物随机分为对照组(无治疗)(n=22)或接受静脉(IV)CPT 人体等效(HE)剂量(600mg/12h;n=19)或 IV CRO HE 剂量(1g/24h;n=19)的组。达到 HE 剂量所需的总剂量分别为 71 和 82mg/kg 体重/24h 用于 CRO 和 CPT。一组感染 CRO-R PRSP 株的兔子接受肌内(IM)CPT 给药(5 或 20mg/kg,每日两次;每组 n=5)。疗效评估基于肺部和脾脏的细菌计数。对于 IV CPT 和 IV CRO,从 0 到 24 小时的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC(0-24)s)分别为 155 和 938mg·h/liter,血清中的最大浓度(C(max)s)分别为 20 和 158mg/liter,血清中的最小浓度(C(min)s)分别为 1.3 和 6mg/liter。两种药物均有效治疗了由 CRO-S PSSP 或 CRO-S PISP 引起的肺部感染,在治疗 2 天后肺部和脾脏中的细菌完全清除。对于 PRSP,CPT 表现出极好的杀菌活性,使肺部和脾脏中的细菌计数分别减少约 8 和 4 个对数单位(P<0.001);CRO 治疗使肺部的细菌计数减少了 2 个对数单位,但无统计学意义。每日两次肌内 CPT(5mg/kg)使肺部的细菌负荷减少了约 6 个对数单位,脾脏减少了 3 个对数单位,20mg/kg 剂量有效地根除了 PRSP 感染。这些发现进一步验证了 CPT 对肺炎球菌的体内杀菌活性。

相似文献

1
Ceftaroline versus ceftriaxone in a highly penicillin-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia rabbit model using simulated human dosing.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Jul;55(7):3557-63. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01773-09. Epub 2011 May 16.
7
Efficacy of BAL5788, a prodrug of cephalosporin BAL9141, in a mouse model of acute pneumococcal pneumonia.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Apr;48(4):1105-11. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.4.1105-1111.2004.
8
Efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil against penicillin-sensitive and -resistant streptococcus pneumoniae in an experimental rabbit meningitis model.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Oct;57(10):4653-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00286-13. Epub 2013 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Ceftaroline Fosamil for Treatment of Pediatric Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections and Community-Acquired Pneumonia.
Paediatr Drugs. 2021 Nov;23(6):549-563. doi: 10.1007/s40272-021-00468-w. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
2
Serotypes and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Nasopharyngeal Isolates of from Children Less Than 5 Years Old in Egypt.
Infect Drug Resist. 2020 Oct 19;13:3669-3677. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S250315. eCollection 2020.
3
Animal Models of .
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Aug 28;20(17):4220. doi: 10.3390/ijms20174220.
4
Port d'Entrée for Respiratory Infections - Does the Influenza A Virus Pave the Way for Bacteria?
Front Microbiol. 2017 Dec 21;8:2602. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02602. eCollection 2017.
5
Serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Egyptian children: are they covered by pneumococcal conjugate vaccines?
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Dec;36(12):2385-2389. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3071-z. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
9
Examining the use of ceftaroline in the treatment of Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis with reference to human cathelicidin LL-37.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Apr;59(4):2428-31. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04965-14. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
10
Ceftaroline fosamil: a brief clinical review.
Infect Dis Ther. 2013 Dec;2(2):95-110. doi: 10.1007/s40121-013-0010-x. Epub 2013 Aug 8.

本文引用的文献

5
In vitro activity of ceftaroline (PPI-0903M, T-91825) against bacteria with defined resistance mechanisms and phenotypes.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Aug;60(2):300-11. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm150. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
8
The Alexander Project: the benefits from a decade of surveillance.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Oct;56 Suppl 2:ii3-ii21. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki297.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验