• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将基因检测(5-HTTLPR)纳入治疗重度抑郁症的药理学治疗模型。

A model to incorporate genetic testing (5-HTTLPR) in pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorders.

机构信息

Institute of Psychiatry, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

World J Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;12(7):501-15. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2011.572998. Epub 2011 May 19.

DOI:10.3109/15622975.2011.572998
PMID:21595526
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the benefit of pharmacogenetics in antidepressant treatment.

METHODS

In a simulated trial 100,000 subjects in a current episode of major depressive disorder (MDD) received citalopram or bupropion based on the clinician's decision (algorithm A) or following indications from 5-HTTLPR genetic testing (algorithm B), which effect size of was estimated from a meta-analysis of pharmacogenetic trials. A and B were compared in a cost-utility analysis (12 weeks). Costs (international $, 2010) were drawn from official sources. Treatment effects were expressed as quality-adjusted life weeks (QALWs). Outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

Under base-case conditions, genetic test use was associated with increases in antidepressant response (0.062 QALWs) and tolerability (0.016 QALWs) but cost benefit was not acceptable (ICER = $2,890; $1,800-$4,091). However, when the joint effect on antidepressant response and tolerability was analyzed in two recurrent episodes, ICER dropped to $1,392 ($837-$1,982). Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) showed a >80% probability that ICER value fell below the commonly accepted 3 times Gross Domestic Product (GDP) threshold (World Health Organization) and therefore suggesting cost-effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Notwithstanding some caveats (exclusion of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions; simple 5-HTTLPR architecture), this simulation is favourable to incorporate pharmacogenetic test in antidepressant treatment.

摘要

目的

评估药物遗传学在抗抑郁治疗中的获益。

方法

在一项模拟试验中,10 万名当前患有重度抑郁症(MDD)的患者根据临床医生的决策(算法 A)或 5-HTTLPR 基因检测结果(算法 B)接受西酞普兰或安非他酮治疗,后者的疗效大小是根据药物遗传学试验的荟萃分析估计的。在成本-效用分析(12 周)中比较了 A 和 B。成本(国际美元,2010 年)来自官方来源。治疗效果以质量调整生命周数(QALWs)表示。结果为增量成本效益比(ICER)。

结果

在基础条件下,基因检测的使用与抗抑郁药反应(0.062 QALWs)和耐受性(0.016 QALWs)的增加有关,但成本效益不可接受(ICER = 2890 美元;1800-4091 美元)。然而,当在两个复发性发作中分析对抗抑郁反应和耐受性的联合影响时,ICER 降至 1392 美元(837-1982 美元)。成本效益可接受性曲线(CEAC)显示,ICER 值低于普遍接受的 3 倍国内生产总值(GDP)阈值(世界卫生组织)的可能性大于 80%,因此表明具有成本效益。

结论

尽管存在一些注意事项(排除基因-基因和基因-环境相互作用;简单的 5-HTTLPR 结构),但该模拟结果有利于将药物遗传学检测纳入抗抑郁治疗。

相似文献

1
A model to incorporate genetic testing (5-HTTLPR) in pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorders.将基因检测(5-HTTLPR)纳入治疗重度抑郁症的药理学治疗模型。
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;12(7):501-15. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2011.572998. Epub 2011 May 19.
2
Should pharmacogenetics be incorporated in major depression treatment? Economic evaluation in high- and middle-income European countries.是否应将药物遗传学纳入重度抑郁症的治疗中?高、中收入欧洲国家的经济评估。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Jan 10;36(1):147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2011.08.013. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
3
Does pretreatment testing for serotonin transporter polymorphisms lead to earlier effects of drug treatment in patients with major depression? A decision-analytic model.对5-羟色胺转运体基因多态性进行预处理检测是否能使重度抑郁症患者更早地获得药物治疗效果?一项决策分析模型。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):691-702. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.04.018.
4
When is pharmacogenetic testing for antidepressant response ready for the clinic? A cost-effectiveness analysis based on data from the STAR*D study.抗抑郁反应的药物遗传学检测何时可应用于临床?基于STAR*D研究数据的成本效益分析。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Sep;34(10):2227-36. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.50. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
5
Developing thai economic model to study cost-effectiveness of switching to bupropion compared to combination with bupropion after the failure of an SSRI for major depressive disorder.建立泰国经济模型,以研究在使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)治疗重度抑郁症失败后,改用安非他酮与联用安非他酮相比的成本效益。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Nov;93 Suppl 6:S35-42.
6
Effect of antidepressant medication treatment on suicidal ideation and behavior in a randomized trial: an exploratory report from the Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes Study.抗抑郁药治疗对随机试验中自杀意念和行为的影响:来自联合用药以增强抑郁结局研究的探索性报告。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;72(10):1322-32. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06724.
7
A cost-effectiveness model of escitalopram, citalopram,and venlafaxine as first-line treatment for major depressive disorder in Belgium.艾司西酞普兰、西酞普兰和文拉法辛作为比利时重度抑郁症一线治疗药物的成本效益模型。
Clin Ther. 2005 Jan;27(1):111-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.01.001.
8
Cost-effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of major depression: a health economics analysis.经颅磁刺激治疗重性抑郁症的成本效果分析:健康经济学研究。
Adv Ther. 2009 Mar;26(3):346-68. doi: 10.1007/s12325-009-0013-x. Epub 2009 Mar 28.
9
[Possibility of a pharmacogenetic approach for prediction and personalized medication in major depressive disorder treatment].[药物遗传学方法用于预测和个体化治疗重度抑郁症的可能性]
Nihon Shinkei Seishin Yakurigaku Zasshi. 2010 Apr;30(2):83-92.
10
Interaction of serotonin-related genes affects short-term antidepressant response in major depressive disorder.血清素相关基因的相互作用影响重度抑郁症的短期抗抑郁反应。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Oct 1;33(7):1167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.06.015. Epub 2009 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of genotype-guided optimization of major depression treatment in Qatar.卡塔尔重度抑郁症治疗中基因型指导优化的成本效益分析
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Oct 25;17(1):2410197. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2410197. eCollection 2024.
2
A Promising Approach to Optimizing Sequential Treatment Decisions for Depression: Markov Decision Process.优化抑郁症序贯治疗决策的一种有前途的方法:马尔可夫决策过程。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Nov;40(11):1015-1032. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01185-z. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
3
Multi-gene Pharmacogenomic Testing That Includes Decision-Support Tools to Guide Medication Selection for Major Depression: A Health Technology Assessment.
多基因药物基因组学检测,包括用于指导抗抑郁药物选择的决策支持工具:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2021 Aug 12;21(13):1-214. eCollection 2021.
4
Economic evaluation in psychiatric pharmacogenomics: a systematic review.精神药理学基因组学中的经济评估:系统评价。
Pharmacogenomics J. 2021 Aug;21(4):533-541. doi: 10.1038/s41397-021-00249-1. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
5
Model-Based Economic Evaluation of Treatments for Depression: A Systematic Literature Review.基于模型的抑郁症治疗经济评估:系统文献综述
Pharmacoecon Open. 2017 Sep;1(3):149-165. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0014-7.
6
Cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetic-guided treatment: are we there yet?药物基因组学指导治疗的成本效益:我们做到了吗?
Pharmacogenomics J. 2017 Oct;17(5):395-402. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2017.21. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
7
Rapid evidence review of the comparative effectiveness, harms, and cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided antidepressant treatment versus usual care for major depressive disorder.药物基因组学指导的抗抑郁治疗与重度抑郁症常规治疗的比较有效性、危害及成本效益的快速证据综述。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Jun;234(11):1649-1661. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4622-9. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
8
Economic Evaluations of Pharmacogenetic and Pharmacogenomic Screening Tests: A Systematic Review. Second Update of the Literature.药物遗传学和药物基因组学筛查试验的经济学评估:系统评价。文献的第二次更新
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0146262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146262. eCollection 2016.
9
Combinatorial Versus Individual Gene Pharmacogenomic Testing in Mental Health: A Perspective on Context and Implications on Clinical Utility.心理健康领域中组合基因与个体基因药物基因组学检测:关于背景及临床效用影响的观点
Yale J Biol Med. 2015 Nov 24;88(4):375-82. eCollection 2015 Dec.
10
Pharmacogenetics of major depressive disorder: top genes and pathways toward clinical applications.重度抑郁症的药物遗传学:迈向临床应用的关键基因和通路
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 Jul;17(7):50. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0594-9.