• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉疾病患病率对冠状动脉 CT 血管造影预测值的影响:一项荟萃回归分析。

Influence of coronary artery disease prevalence on predictive values of coronary CT angiography: a meta-regression analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Documentation, University Hospital of Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2011 Sep;21(9):1904-13. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2142-2. Epub 2011 May 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00330-011-2142-2
PMID:21597986
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) prevalence on the predictive values of coronary CT angiography.

METHODS

We performed a meta-regression based on a generalised linear mixed model using the binomial distribution and a logit link to analyse the influence of the prevalence of CAD in published studies on the per-patient negative and positive predictive values of CT in comparison to conventional coronary angiography as the reference standard. A prevalence range in which the negative predictive value was higher than 90%, while at the same time the positive predictive value was higher than 70% was considered appropriate.

RESULTS

The summary negative and positive predictive values of coronary CT angiography were 93.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 92.8-94.5%) and 87.5% (95% CI, 86.5-88.5%), respectively. With 95% confidence, negative and positive predictive values higher than 90% and 70% were available with CT for a CAD prevalence of 18-63%. CT systems with >16 detector rows met these requirements for the positive (P < 0.01) and negative (P < 0.05) predictive values in a significantly broader range than systems with ≤16 detector rows.

CONCLUSION

It is reasonable to perform coronary CT angiography as a rule-out test in patients with a low-to-intermediate likelihood of disease.

摘要

目的

评估冠状动脉疾病 (CAD) 患病率对冠状动脉 CT 血管造影预测值的影响。

方法

我们使用基于广义线性混合模型的荟萃回归,采用二项式分布和对数链接,分析发表研究中 CAD 患病率对 CT 每例患者阴性和阳性预测值的影响,以传统冠状动脉造影作为参考标准。我们认为,当阴性预测值高于 90%,同时阳性预测值高于 70%的患病率范围是合适的。

结果

冠状动脉 CT 血管造影的汇总阴性和阳性预测值分别为 93.7%(95%置信区间 [CI] 92.8-94.5%)和 87.5%(95% CI,86.5-88.5%)。在 95%置信区间内,CAD 患病率为 18-63%时,CT 的阴性和阳性预测值均高于 90%和 70%。阳性预测值(P<0.01)和阴性预测值(P<0.05)方面,具有 >16 个探测器排的 CT 系统在比具有 ≤16 个探测器排的系统更广泛的范围内满足这些要求。

结论

对于疾病低至中度可能性的患者,进行冠状动脉 CT 血管造影作为排除检查是合理的。

相似文献

1
Influence of coronary artery disease prevalence on predictive values of coronary CT angiography: a meta-regression analysis.冠状动脉疾病患病率对冠状动脉 CT 血管造影预测值的影响:一项荟萃回归分析。
Eur Radiol. 2011 Sep;21(9):1904-13. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2142-2. Epub 2011 May 20.
2
Individual patient data meta-analysis for the clinical assessment of coronary computed tomography angiography: protocol of the Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Cardiac CT (CoMe-CCT).基于个体患者数据的冠状动脉 CT 血管成像临床评估的荟萃分析:心脏 CT 协作荟萃分析(CoMe-CCT)的方案。
Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 15;2:13. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-13.
3
Dual-source CT versus single-source 64-section CT angiography for coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.双源CT与单源64层CT血管造影术用于冠状动脉疾病的Meta分析
Clin Radiol. 2014 Aug;69(8):861-9. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.03.023. Epub 2014 May 20.
4
Incremental diagnostic accuracy of hybrid SPECT/CT coronary angiography in a population with an intermediate to high pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease.混合 SPECT/CT 冠状动脉成像在中等至高冠状动脉疾病预检测可能性人群中的诊断准确性逐步提高。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jul;14(7):642-9. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jes303. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
5
Diagnostic value of 64-slice CT angiography in coronary artery disease: a systematic review.64层CT血管造影术对冠状动脉疾病的诊断价值:一项系统评价
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Jul;67(1):78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.07.014. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
6
Diagnostic accuracy and utility of coronary CT angiography with consideration of unevaluable results: A systematic review and multivariate Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis with intention to diagnose.考虑到不可评估结果,冠状动脉 CT 血管造影的诊断准确性和实用性:一项系统评价和多变量贝叶斯随机效应荟萃分析,意向诊断。
Eur Radiol. 2016 Feb;26(2):451-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3831-z. Epub 2015 May 20.
7
Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis.多层螺旋CT血管造影术评估冠状动脉疾病的诊断性能:荟萃分析
Radiology. 2007 Aug;244(2):419-28. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2442061218.
8
Coronary CT angiography versus conventional cardiac angiography for therapeutic decision making in patients with high likelihood of coronary artery disease.冠状动脉 CT 血管造影与传统心脏血管造影在高冠状动脉疾病可能性患者治疗决策中的比较。
Radiology. 2012 Nov;265(2):385-92. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112426. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
9
Accuracy of dual-source computed tomography to identify significant coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison with coronary angiography.双源 CT 对房颤患者中显著冠状动脉疾病的诊断准确性:与冠状动脉造影的比较。
Eur Heart J. 2010 Sep;31(18):2230-7. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq223. Epub 2010 Jul 11.
10
128-detector-row computed tomography coronary angiography evaluating coronary artery disease: who avoids cardiac catheterization?128 排计算机断层冠状动脉成像术评估冠状动脉疾病:谁可以避免进行心脏导管检查?
Angiology. 2010 Feb;61(2):174-8. doi: 10.1177/0003319709335513. Epub 2009 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Utility of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Based on Published Data from 7458 Patients.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影在接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者中的应用:基于7458例患者已发表数据的荟萃分析和荟萃回归
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 22;13(2):631. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020631.
2
Incremental role of CT coronary angiography in the assessment of left ventricular diastolic function.CT 冠状动脉成像在评估左心室舒张功能中的增量作用。
Open Heart. 2021 Mar;8(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001566.
3
Diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease using computed tomography angiography in patients with stable chest pain depending on clinical probability and in clinically important subgroups: meta-analysis of individual patient data.

本文引用的文献

1
Explanatory Item Response Models: A Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Approach by P. de Boeck and M. Wilson and Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal and Structural Equation Models by A. Skrondal and S. Rabe-Hesketh.《解释性项目反应模型:P. 德博克和M. 威尔逊的广义线性与非线性方法》以及《广义潜在变量建模:A. 斯克隆达尔和S. R. 拉贝 - 赫斯克思的多层次、纵向和结构方程模型》
Psychometrika. 2006 Jun;71(2):415-418. doi: 10.1007/s11336-005-1333-7.
2
ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 心脏计算机断层扫描适用标准。美国心脏病学会基金会适用标准特别工作组、心血管计算机断层扫描学会、美国放射学会、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、美国核医学学会、北美心血管成像学会、心血管血管造影和介入学会以及心血管磁共振学会的报告。
采用计算机断层血管造影术诊断稳定型胸痛患者的阻塞性冠状动脉疾病:基于临床概率和具有临床重要意义的亚组的个体患者数据的荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Jun 12;365:l1945. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1945.
4
Extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography in patients without significant coronary artery disease.无明显冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉 CT 血管造影的心脏外表现。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):1714-1723. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5688-4. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
5
Applicability and accuracy of pretest probability calculations implemented in the NICE clinical guideline for decision making about imaging in patients with chest pain of recent onset.在 NICE 临床指南中实施的用于近期发作胸痛患者影像学检查决策的预测概率计算的适用性和准确性。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Sep;28(9):4006-4017. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5322-5. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
6
Coronary Artery Disease: Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of CT Perfusion and MR Perfusion Imaging in Comparison with Quantitative Coronary Angiography and SPECT-Multicenter Prospective Trial.冠状动脉疾病:CT灌注和MR灌注成像与定量冠状动脉造影及SPECT对比的诊断性能分析——多中心前瞻性试验
Radiology. 2018 Feb;286(2):461-470. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162447. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
7
Computed tomography versus invasive coronary angiography: design and methods of the pragmatic randomised multicentre DISCHARGE trial.计算机断层扫描与有创冠状动脉造影术:务实随机多中心DISCHARGE试验的设计与方法
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jul;27(7):2957-2968. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4620-z. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
8
Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with atypical angina or chest pain clinically referred for invasive coronary angiography: randomised controlled trial.对临床上因非典型心绞痛或胸痛而转诊进行有创冠状动脉造影的患者进行计算机断层扫描评估:随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5441.
9
Beyond Trisomy 21: Additional Chromosomal Anomalies Detected through Routine Aneuploidy Screening.超越21三体综合征:通过常规非整倍体筛查检测到的其他染色体异常。
J Clin Med. 2014 Apr 8;3(2):388-415. doi: 10.3390/jcm3020388.
10
Prospectively ECG-Triggered Sequential Dual-Source Coronary CT Angiography in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Influence of Heart Rate on Image Quality and Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy.前瞻性心电图触发的序贯双源冠状动脉CT血管造影在心房颤动患者中的应用:心率对图像质量的影响及诊断准确性评估
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 29;10(7):e0134194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134194. eCollection 2015.
Circulation. 2010 Nov 23;122(21):e525-55. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181fcae66. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
3
The uncritical use of high-tech medical imaging.高科技医学成像的盲目使用。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):4-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1003173. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
4
Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging.荟萃分析:计算机断层扫描与磁共振成像用于非侵入性冠状动脉造影。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Feb 2;152(3):167-77. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-3-201002020-00008.
5
Patient characteristics as predictors of image quality and diagnostic accuracy of MDCT compared with conventional coronary angiography for detecting coronary artery stenoses: CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial.患者特征作为 MDCT 与常规冠状动脉造影检测冠状动脉狭窄的图像质量和诊断准确性的预测因素:CORE-64 多中心国际试验。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jan;194(1):93-102. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2833.
6
CT coronary angiography in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease: decision making from various perspectives in the face of uncertainty.疑诊冠心病患者的 CT 冠状动脉成像:面对不确定性的多视角决策。
Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):734-44. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2533090507. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
7
Dual source CT coronary angiography in severely obese patients: trading off temporal resolution and image noise.双源 CT 冠状动脉成像在肥胖患者中的应用:在时间分辨率和图像噪声之间进行权衡。
Invest Radiol. 2009 Nov;44(11):720-7. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b46f1a.
8
CT angiography: first things first.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Jan;2(1):1-3. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.841429.
9
Direct comparison of whole-heart navigator-gated magnetic resonance coronary angiography and 40- and 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography to detect the coronary artery stenosis in patients scheduled for conventional coronary angiography.对计划进行传统冠状动脉造影的患者,采用全心导航门控磁共振冠状动脉造影与40层和64层多排螺旋计算机断层扫描直接比较检测冠状动脉狭窄情况。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Sep;1(2):114-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.107.756304. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
10
Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation.320排计算机断层扫描进行的低辐射暴露且诊断准确性得以维持的无创冠状动脉造影:在一项直接比较的初步研究中与心脏导管插入术的结果对比
Circulation. 2009 Sep 8;120(10):867-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.859280. Epub 2009 Aug 24.