Suppr超能文献

验证 DeLiT 试验静脉内胰岛素输注算法在非心脏手术中用于术中血糖控制的效果:一项随机对照试验。

Validation of the DeLiT Trial intravenous insulin infusion algorithm for intraoperative glucose control in noncardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of General Anesthesiology-E31, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2011 Jul;58(7):606-616. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9509-3. Epub 2011 May 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

A safe and effective insulin infusion algorithm that achieves rigorous intraoperative glycemic control in noncardiac surgery has yet to be formally characterized and evaluated. We therefore report the validation of the DeLit Trial insulin infusion algorithm.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for major noncardiac surgery were randomized to a target intraoperative blood glucose concentration of 4.4-6.1 mmoL·L(-1) (80-110 mg·dL(-1)) intensive group or 10-11.1 mmoL·L(-1) (180-200 mg·dL(-1)) conventional group. Glucose was managed with a dynamic intravenous insulin infusion algorithm. We compared the randomized groups on glucose time-weighted average (TWA), proportion of time spent within target, number of severe (< 2.2 mmoL·L(-1) or < 40 mg·dL(-1)) or moderate (< 2.8 mmoL·L(-1) or < 50 mg·dL(-1)) hypoglycemic episodes, and within-patient variability in glucose concentrations expressed as standard deviation from the patient mean.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-seven patients were assigned to intensive glucose control, and 177 patients were assigned to conventional glucose control. Median (lower quartile value [Q1], upper quartile value [Q3]) of intraoperative TWA for the intensive vs conventional groups was 6 [5.6, 6.7] mmoL·L(-1) vs 7.7 [6.9, 9.2] mmoL·L(-1), respectively; P < 0.001. The intensive group spent 49% (29, 71) of the time within target, substantially more time than the conventional group spent either within the intensive target or within its own target (both P < 0.001). The intensive group had slightly lower within-patient glucose variability than the conventional group (0.9 [0.7, 1.3] mmoL·L(-1) vs 1.3 [0.8, 1.8] mmoL·L(-1), respectively; P < 0.001). Three patients had moderate hypoglycemia (intensive group), but none experienced severe episodes.

CONCLUSION

Tight intraoperative glucose control in noncardiac surgery can be maintained successfully without serious hypoglycemic episodes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00433251).

摘要

目的

尚未正式描述和评估一种安全有效的胰岛素输注算法,以实现非心脏手术中的严格术中血糖控制。因此,我们报告了 DeLit 试验胰岛素输注算法的验证结果。

方法

择期行非心脏大手术的患者随机分为目标术中血糖浓度为 4.4-6.1mmol·L(80-110mg·dL)的强化组或 10-11.1mmol·L(180-200mg·dL)的常规组。葡萄糖采用动态静脉内胰岛素输注算法进行管理。我们比较了随机分组患者的血糖时间加权平均值(TWA)、目标内时间比例、严重(<2.2mmol·L(<40mg·dL)或中度(<2.8mmol·L(<50mg·dL))低血糖发作次数以及血糖浓度的患者内变异性,以患者平均值的标准差表示。

结果

187 例患者被分配到强化血糖控制组,177 例患者被分配到常规血糖控制组。强化组与常规组术中 TWA 的中位数(下四分位数[Q1],上四分位数[Q3])分别为 6[5.6,6.7]mmol·L 和 7.7[6.9,9.2]mmol·L(P<0.001)。强化组有 49%(29,71)的时间在目标范围内,明显多于常规组在强化目标内或在自身目标内的时间(均 P<0.001)。强化组的患者内血糖变异性略低于常规组(0.9[0.7,1.3]mmol·L 和 1.3[0.8,1.8]mmol·L,分别;P<0.001)。强化组有 3 例出现中度低血糖(<2.8mmol·L),但无严重低血糖发作。

结论

非心脏手术中严格的术中血糖控制可以成功维持,而不会出现严重的低血糖事件。(临床试验注册号:NCT00433251)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验