Suppr超能文献

无症状屈光手术候选人的隐形眼镜储存盒的污染。

Contamination of contact lens storage cases of asymptomatic refractive surgery candidates.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Guiron University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2011 Nov;27(11):811-7. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20110505-01. Epub 2011 May 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the rates of contamination of contact lens storage cases of refractive surgery candidates and compare the growth yields of the traditional method of culturing and a broth-based method.

METHODS

Thirty contact lens storage cases of 16 asymptomatic refractive surgery candidates were studied. Samples from the lens storage case fluid were inoculated into Bactec Peds Plus F broth (Becton Dickinson) and also directly onto blood agar, chocolate agar, and Sabouraud dextrose agar ("traditional method"). Another sample was processed for amoebal contamination. The rate of contamination of cases and the types of pathogens were evaluated for the broth-based and traditional culturing methods. Correlation between right and left storage cases of the same patient was defined as contamination of the two compartments with the same pathogen or pathogens. To avoid statistical bias, only one compartment was included in the study for these patients.

RESULTS

Four storage cases were omitted due to growth correlation between right and left storage cases. Of the remaining 26 storage cases, 16 (61.5%) were found to be contaminated using the broth-based method and 10 (38.5%) using the traditional method (P=.011). High contamination rates were observed regardless of the type of disinfecting solution or type of contact lens used.

CONCLUSIONS

The broth-based method had significantly greater culture yield than the traditional method. The high rates of contamination of contact lens storage cases of refractive surgery patients may put this cohort at greater risk than non-contact lens wearing candidates for developing postoperative infections.

摘要

目的

调查屈光手术患者接触镜储存盒的污染率,并比较传统培养方法和基于肉汤的方法的生长产量。

方法

研究了 16 名无症状屈光手术候选者的 30 个接触镜储存盒。从镜片储存盒液体中采集样本,接种到 Bactec Peds Plus F 肉汤(BD)中,并直接接种到血琼脂、巧克力琼脂和沙氏葡萄糖琼脂(“传统方法”)上。另一个样本用于处理阿米巴污染。评估了基于肉汤的培养方法和传统培养方法的病例污染率和病原体类型。将同一患者的左右储存盒之间的相关性定义为两个隔室被同一病原体或病原体污染。为避免统计偏差,对于这些患者,仅将一个隔室纳入研究。

结果

由于右和左储存盒之间的生长相关性,有 4 个储存盒被排除在外。在剩余的 26 个储存盒中,有 16 个(61.5%)使用基于肉汤的方法和 10 个(38.5%)使用传统方法发现被污染(P=.011)。无论使用哪种消毒剂或接触镜类型,污染率都很高。

结论

基于肉汤的方法比传统方法具有更高的培养产量。屈光手术患者接触镜储存盒的高污染率可能使该患者群体比不戴接触镜的候选者更容易发生术后感染。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验