Tanta University Hospitals, Tanta, Egypt.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Oct;145(4):683-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599811410534. Epub 2011 May 25.
To conduct a prospective randomized controlled study to investigate the safety and efficacy of endocanalicular, high-pressure, 5-mm balloon catheter, endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) in adult patients with acquired complete nasolacrimal obstruction.
Prospective randomized controlled study.
General hospital.
Sixty-six adult patients with a total of 70 procedures were recruited to undergo endoscopic DCR. They were prospectively, equally randomized into 2 groups: endocanalicular, high-pressure, 5-mm balloon catheter, endoscopic DCR (group I) and conventional endoscopic DCR (group II). Regular follow-up sessions were conducted to document the patient's subjective improvement, judge ostium patency on irrigation, and record any complications.
Both groups demonstrated a success rate of 91.4%. There was a shorter mean operative time (25.7 minutes) in group I (P < .001). The number of adverse events was significantly higher in group II (P < .05). Group I showed statistically significantly more comfort during surgery under local anesthesia with minimal sedation (P < .05).
Endocanalicular balloon catheter endoscopic DCR shares the advantages and success rate of conventional endoscopic DCR. In addition, the former is simpler, requires less manipulation, consumes a shorter operative time, has a better safety profile, and can be conducted under local anesthesia with minimal sedation.
进行一项前瞻性随机对照研究,以评估经鼻内窥镜下球囊导管内切开术(endo-canalicular, high-pressure, 5-mm balloon catheter, endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy,EBDC)治疗成人获得性完全鼻泪管阻塞的安全性和有效性。
前瞻性随机对照研究。
综合医院。
共招募了 66 例成年患者(共 70 只眼)接受经鼻内窥镜下 EBDC。这些患者前瞻性地被平均随机分为两组:球囊导管内切开经鼻内窥镜下 DCR(组 I)和传统经鼻内窥镜下 DCR(组 II)。定期随访以记录患者的主观改善情况、判断冲洗时泪道通畅情况,并记录任何并发症。
两组的成功率均为 91.4%。组 I 的平均手术时间较短(25.7 分钟)(P <.001)。组 II 的不良事件数量明显更高(P <.05)。在局部麻醉加轻微镇静下,组 I 术中舒适度明显更高(P <.05)。
球囊导管内切开经鼻内窥镜下 DCR 具有与传统经鼻内窥镜下 DCR 相同的优势和成功率。此外,前者更简单、操作更少、手术时间更短、安全性更好,并且可以在局部麻醉加轻微镇静下进行。