Suppr超能文献

预测英国一项初级保健戒烟研究(ESCAPE 试验)招募情况的因素。

Factors predicting recruitment to a UK wide primary care smoking cessation study (the ESCAPE trial).

机构信息

Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College Medical School, London, UK.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2012 Feb;29(1):110-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr030. Epub 2011 May 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recruiting smokers to smoking cessation trials is challenging and participation rates are often low. Consequently, the interventions evaluated may fail to reach a broad spectrum of the target population, thus compromising the generalizability of the findings. Brief interventions, using proactive recruitment, are likely to attract a broader and more representative proportion of the population.

OBJECTIVE

We explored the factors that influenced recruitment into a trial evaluating computer-tailored feedback reports that aimed to help smokers to quit [the ESCAPE (Effectiveness of computer-tailored Smoking Cessation Advice in Primary Care) study] in order to investigate the possibilities for increasing recruitment into smoking cessation trials.

METHODS

Current cigarette smokers, identified from GP records, were invited to participate in the study. The main outcome measure was the recruitment rate, i.e. the proportion of participants who responded and were randomized to one of the intervention groups. Predictor variables included geographical region, level of deprivation, practice characteristics and the number and timing of mailings of questionnaires.

RESULTS

The recruitment rate varied by practice (2.5-19.8%) and differed significantly between regions (from 16.3% in Scotland to 8.4% in London, P < 0.001). Recruitment decreased significantly by 1.1% between the lowest and highest quintiles of deprivation (P = 0.012), measured by Index of Multiple Deprivation scores, and decreased by 1.33% for every extra 10% smokers identified within a practice population (P = 0.010). Sending reminders increased recruitment by 7.5% (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed region and length of time between mailings were the main predictors of recruitment.

CONCLUSIONS

Proactive recruitment methods can increase participation in smoking cessation trials and weighting the target sample in favour of more deprived areas will recruit a more representative sample. The number and timing of mailings to potential participants can also increase recruitment.

摘要

背景

招募吸烟者参与戒烟试验具有挑战性,参与率往往较低。因此,评估的干预措施可能无法覆盖目标人群的广泛范围,从而影响研究结果的普遍性。采用主动招募的简短干预措施可能会吸引更广泛和更具代表性的人群。

目的

我们探讨了影响一项评估计算机定制反馈报告戒烟效果的试验(ESCAPE 研究)招募的因素,以调查增加戒烟试验招募的可能性。

方法

从全科医生记录中确定当前吸烟者,邀请他们参加研究。主要结局指标是招募率,即参与者回应并随机分配到干预组之一的比例。预测变量包括地理位置、贫困程度、实践特征以及问卷的邮寄次数和时间。

结果

招募率因实践而异(2.5%-19.8%),地区之间差异显著(从苏格兰的 16.3%到伦敦的 8.4%,P<0.001)。按综合贫困指数(Index of Multiple Deprivation scores)衡量,贫困程度最低和最高五分位数之间的招募率显著下降了 1.1%(P=0.012),且每增加 10%在实践人群中确定的吸烟者,招募率下降 1.33%(P=0.010)。发送提醒可将招募率提高 7.5%(P<0.001)。多变量分析显示,地区和邮件发送时间间隔是招募的主要预测因素。

结论

主动招募方法可以提高戒烟试验的参与率,对贫困地区的目标样本进行加权将招募更具代表性的样本。向潜在参与者发送邮件的数量和时间也可以增加招募。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验