Callerio Foundation Onlus, via A. Fleming 22, 34127, Trieste, Italy.
Dalton Trans. 2011 Aug 21;40(31):7817-23. doi: 10.1039/c0dt01816c. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
Ruthenium anticancer drugs have attracted an increasing interest in the last 20 years and two of them have entered clinical trials. Compared to platinum drugs, the complexes based on ruthenium are often identified as less toxic and capable of overcoming the resistance induced by platinum drugs in cancer cells. These activities were attributed to the transportation to tumour cells by transferrin and to the selective activation to more reactive species by the reducing environment of solid tumours as compared to healthy tissues. Ruthenium anticancer drugs have been almost always designed to mimic platinum drugs, particularly for targeting DNA. Indeed, none of the above properties has never been clearly demonstrated even for the ruthenium drugs that entered clinical trials. The suggestion for the future is to change the perspective when designing new chemical entities, abandoning the philosophy that guided the actual panel of ruthenium drugs and to look further into the fine mechanism by which the most relevant ruthenium complexes available kill the target tumour cells, then focusing on targets selective of tumour cells and responsible for cell growth and malignancy.
钌类抗癌药物在过去 20 年中引起了越来越多的关注,其中两种已经进入临床试验。与铂类药物相比,基于钌的配合物通常被认为毒性更小,并且能够克服癌细胞中铂类药物诱导的耐药性。这些活性归因于转铁蛋白向肿瘤细胞的转运,以及与健康组织相比,实体瘤的还原环境选择性地激活更具反应性的物质。钌类抗癌药物几乎总是被设计为模仿铂类药物,特别是针对 DNA 的药物。事实上,即使对于进入临床试验的钌类药物,上述特性也从未得到明确证实。未来的建议是在设计新的化学实体时改变视角,放弃指导实际钌类药物的理念,进一步研究最相关的钌类配合物杀死靶肿瘤细胞的精细机制,然后专注于选择性杀伤肿瘤细胞的靶点和负责细胞生长和恶性的靶点。