Suppr超能文献

电磁场的比较健康风险评估

Comparative health risk assessment of electromagnetic fields.

作者信息

Leitgeb Norbert

机构信息

Institute of Health Care Engineering with European Notified Body of Medical Devices, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Wien Med Wochenschr. 2011 May;161(9-10):251-62. doi: 10.1007/s10354-011-0884-8.

Abstract

Comparative health risk assessment of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) has been performed in their entire frequency range from static fields until ionizing radiation. Due to considerable change of physical and biologic interaction and the nature of potential adverse health effects comparison was based on the carcinogenic potential of environmental EMF exposure levels. There was a need for sophisticated discrimination of levels of evidence as well as the available database. Conclusions were based on a synoptic view to results of different scientific approaches such as theoretical and biologic interaction modeling, evidence for accumulative effects, in vitro and in vivo investigations and epidemiologic studies. The comparative assessment revealed significant differences of objective results and public risk perception, and puts EMF risks into perspective. It highlights the necessity for individual's responsible behavior in terms of prudent avoidance. The comparison indicates where risk awareness might merit priority. This is not restricted to the UV range but includes also other exposures such as to nocturnal light or within infrared cabins.

摘要

已经对从静磁场到电离辐射的整个频率范围内的电磁场(EMF)进行了比较健康风险评估。由于物理和生物相互作用以及潜在不良健康影响的性质发生了相当大的变化,因此比较是基于环境EMF暴露水平的致癌潜力。需要对证据水平以及可用数据库进行精细区分。结论基于对不同科学方法结果的综合观点,如理论和生物相互作用建模、累积效应证据、体外和体内研究以及流行病学研究。比较评估揭示了客观结果与公众风险认知之间的显著差异,并对EMF风险进行了客观分析。它强调了个人在谨慎避免方面负责任行为的必要性。比较表明了风险意识可能需要优先考虑的方面。这不仅限于紫外线范围,还包括其他暴露,如夜间光照或红外线舱内暴露。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验