Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
J Chem Ecol. 2011 Jul;37(7):751-64. doi: 10.1007/s10886-011-9985-5. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
Natural enemies of herbivorous insects utilize numerous chemical cues to locate and identify their prey. Among these, volatile plant compounds produced after attack by herbivores may play a significant role (hereafter herbivore-induced plant volatiles or HIPVs). One unresolved question is whether the composition of the volatile cue blends induced by different herbivore species differ consistently enough to indicate not only that the plants are damaged by herbivores but also the identity of the herbivore species causing the damage. We studied HIPV production in the undomesticated plant species Datura wrightii in the laboratory when damaged by either of two leaf-chewing herbivore species, Lema daturaphila or Manduca sexta, or when damaged by L. daturaphila and the piercing-sucking bug, Tupiocoris notatus, or both L. daturaphila and T. notatus, for 24 hr. HIPV production was monitored 1 d before induction, the day of induction, and for 7 d after induction. In all experiments, both the quantities and composition of the HIPV blends varied with the time since induction as different components reached peak production at different times after induction. HIPV blends did not differ consistently with the herbivore species causing the damage. For plants damaged by both L. daturaphila and T. notatus, greater amounts of HIPVs were produced than by plants damaged by either species alone, but the amounts did not differ from that predicted as the sum from damage inflicted by each herbivore species independently. The HIPVs of D. wrightii are a general rather than specific indicator of damage by herbivores. Because generalist predators are the most abundant natural enemies in this system, general cues of herbivore damage may be all that are required to facilitate the discovery by predators of plants damaged by any of several suitable prey species.
植食性昆虫的天敌利用许多化学线索来定位和识别它们的猎物。在这些线索中,被草食性动物攻击后产生的挥发性植物化合物可能起着重要作用(以下简称植食性诱导植物挥发物或 HIPVs)。一个悬而未决的问题是,不同草食性物种诱导的挥发性线索混合物的组成是否足够一致,不仅可以表明植物受到草食性动物的损害,还可以表明造成损害的草食性动物的身份。我们在实验室中研究了未驯化植物物种 Datura wrightii 在受到两种食叶草食性动物(Lema daturaphila 或 Manduca sexta)或受到 L. daturaphila 和刺吸性昆虫 Tupiocoris notatus 或两者的损伤后 24 小时内的 HIPV 产生情况。在诱导前 1 天、诱导当天和诱导后 7 天监测 HIPV 的产生。在所有实验中,随着时间的推移,不同成分达到诱导后不同时间的峰值,HIPV 混合物的数量和组成都发生了变化。HIPV 混合物与造成损害的草食性动物物种不一致。对于同时受到 L. daturaphila 和 T. notatus 损害的植物,产生的 HIPV 量比单独受到任何一种物种损害的植物要多,但与每种草食性动物单独造成损害的预测值没有差异。D. wrightii 的 HIPVs 是草食性动物损害的一般而不是特异性指标。由于在这个系统中,专食性捕食者是最丰富的天敌,因此一般的草食性动物损害线索可能足以促进捕食者发现任何几种合适的猎物物种造成的植物损害。