Suppr超能文献

左束支传导阻滞图形且伴有高心脏风险的心肌 SPECT 患者:目前的管理是否足够?

Patients with left bundle branch block pattern and high cardiac risk myocardial SPECT: does the current management suffice?

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435, CM, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands,

出版信息

Neth Heart J. 2013 Mar;21(3):118-24. doi: 10.1007/s12471-011-0174-5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) is frequently used for cardiovascular risk stratification. The significance of MPS in patients with abnormal electrical ventricular activation is often questionable. This review assesses the value of MPS for risk stratification of patients with intrinsic left bundle branch block or that due to right ventricular apical pacing.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature by a search of the MEDLINE database (January 1980 to September 2010). The terms prognosis or prognostic value were combined with SPECT and LBBB or pacing or pacemakers. MPS was categorised as low and high risk according to the original definitions.

RESULTS

We identified 11 studies suitable for review. A low-risk MPS is associated with a low risk of cardiac events whereas high-risk MPS carries a 4.8-fold increased risk, 95% CI [3.2 - 7.2] (p < 0.0001). Despite secondary prevention and an improved medical and interventional care, these figures have hardly changed over time.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

A low-risk MPS permits a policy of watchful waiting whereas a high-risk MPS requires further analysis and treatment. The persistent high cardiac death and acute myocardial infarction rate after a high-risk MPS suggest that the current management of these patients does not suffice and needs reconsideration.

摘要

简介

心肌灌注 SPECT(MPS)常用于心血管风险分层。对于心室电活动异常的患者,MPS 的意义往往存在争议。本综述评估了 MPS 对固有左束支传导阻滞或右室心尖起搏患者进行风险分层的价值。

方法

我们通过 MEDLINE 数据库(1980 年 1 月至 2010 年 9 月)进行文献检索。将预后或预后价值等术语与 SPECT、LBBB、起搏或起搏器结合起来进行检索。根据原始定义,MPS 分为低风险和高风险。

结果

我们确定了 11 项适合综述的研究。低风险 MPS 与心脏事件的低风险相关,而高风险 MPS 则使风险增加 4.8 倍,95%CI [3.2-7.2](p<0.0001)。尽管进行了二级预防和改善的医疗和介入治疗,但这些数据在过去的时间里几乎没有变化。

结论和临床意义

低风险 MPS 允许采取观察等待策略,而高风险 MPS 需要进一步分析和治疗。高风险 MPS 后心脏性死亡和急性心肌梗死的高发生率表明,目前对这些患者的管理不足,需要重新考虑。

相似文献

2
Myocardial perfusion SPECT identifies patients with left bundle branch block patterns at high risk for future coronary events.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2010 Apr;17(2):216-24. doi: 10.1007/s12350-009-9183-9. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
10
Intracardiac Delineation of Septal Conduction in Left Bundle-Branch Block Patterns.
Circulation. 2019 Apr 16;139(16):1876-1888. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038648.

引用本文的文献

1
Rate-dependent left bundle branch block caused by hyperkalaemia.
Neth Heart J. 2016 Mar;24(3):217-8. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0795-1.
3
Exercise-induced left bundle branch block: an infrequent phenomenon: Report of two cases.
World J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 26;5(9):359-63. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v5.i9.359.
4
Crown years for non-invasive cardiovascular imaging (Part II): 40 years of nuclear cardiology.
Neth Heart J. 2013 May;21(5):211-3. doi: 10.1007/s12471-013-0392-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Myocardial perfusion SPECT identifies patients with left bundle branch block patterns at high risk for future coronary events.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2010 Apr;17(2):216-24. doi: 10.1007/s12350-009-9183-9. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
4
Minimizing ventricular pacing to reduce atrial fibrillation in sinus-node disease.
N Engl J Med. 2007 Sep 6;357(10):1000-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071880.
5
Prognostic value of gated SPECT in patients with left bundle branch block.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Jan;14(1):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.10.018.
6
Prognostic significance of incident complete left bundle branch block observed over a 40-year period.
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Sep 1;98(5):644-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.03.044. Epub 2006 Jul 5.
10
The prognostic value of pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with permanent pacemakers.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2004.08.004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验