Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Jun;81(6):1330-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.037. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
To determine the capability of reduced-dose chest CT with three-dimensional (3D) automatic exposure control (AEC) on quantitative assessment of emphysematous change in smoker' lung parenchyma, compared to standard chest CT.
Twenty consecutive smoker patients (mean age 62.8 years) underwent CT examinations using a standard protocol (150 mAs) and a protocol with 3D-AEC. In this study, the targeted standard deviations number was set to 160. For quantitative assessment of emphysematous change in lung parenchyma in each subject using the standard protocol, a percentage of voxels less than -950 HU in the lung (%LAA(-950)) was calculated. The 3D-AEC protocol's %LAA was computed from of voxel percentages under selected threshold CT value. The differences of radiation doses between these two protocols were evaluated, and %LAAs(-950) was compared with the 3D-AEC protocol %LAAs.
Mean dose length products were 780.2 ± 145.5 mGy cm (standard protocol), and 192.0 ± 95.9 (3D-AEC protocol). There was significant difference between them (paired Student's t test, p<0.00001). Meanwhile, only setting -960 HU yielded no significant difference (paired Student's t test, p=0.32) between %LAAs(-950) and 3D-AEC protocol %LAAs. In adopting the feasible threshold CT values of the 3D-AEC protocol, the 3D-AEC protocol %LAAs were significantly correlated with %LAAs(-950) (r = 0.98, p<0.001) and limits of agreement from Bland-Altman analysis was 0.52 ± 4.3%.
Changing threshold CT values demonstrated that reduced-dose chest CT with 3D-AEC can substitute for the standard protocol in assessments of emphysematous change in smoker' lung parenchyma.
比较三维(3D)自动曝光控制(AEC)降低剂量胸部 CT 与标准胸部 CT 对吸烟者肺部实质肺气肿改变的定量评估能力。
20 例连续吸烟者患者(平均年龄 62.8 岁)接受了标准方案(150 mAs)和 3D-AEC 方案的 CT 检查。在本研究中,目标标准偏差数设置为 160。对于每个受试者使用标准方案进行的肺部实质肺气肿改变的定量评估,计算了肺部小于-950 HU 的体素百分比(%LAA(-950))。3D-AEC 方案的%LAA 是从选定阈值 CT 值下的体素百分比计算得出的。评估了这两种方案之间的辐射剂量差异,并将%LAAs(-950)与 3D-AEC 方案的%LAAs 进行了比较。
平均剂量长度乘积分别为标准方案 780.2±145.5 mGy cm 和 3D-AEC 方案 192.0±95.9。两者之间存在显著差异(配对学生 t 检验,p<0.00001)。同时,仅设置-960 HU 时,%LAAs(-950)和 3D-AEC 方案%LAAs 之间无显著差异(配对学生 t 检验,p=0.32)。在采用 3D-AEC 方案的可行阈值 CT 值的情况下,3D-AEC 方案的%LAAs 与%LAAs(-950)显著相关(r=0.98,p<0.001),Bland-Altman 分析的一致性界限为 0.52±4.3%。
改变阈值 CT 值表明,3D-AEC 降低剂量胸部 CT 可替代标准方案评估吸烟者肺部实质肺气肿改变。