Department of Pediatrics, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland Air Force Base, TX, USA.
Am J Infect Control. 2012 Feb;40(1):43-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.02.011. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
Adult data show a difference in central venous catheter (CVC) infection rates between 3 major sites: subclavian (SC), internal jugular (IJ), and femoral veins. We hypothesized that in patients in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), there is no difference in rates of CVC infection among these three sites, but specifically the femoral compared to all other sites.
In this retrospective cohort study, data from January 1999 to January 2008 were collected prospectively for internal review and quality assurance. All PICU patients with a CVC were enrolled. The rate of CVC infection was determined using Cox regression survival analysis to account for various durations of CVC placement at the various sites, then adjusted for severity of illness, number of lumens, and patient age. Mortality was compared in patients with a CVC infection versus those without.
A total of 4,512 patients with a CVC were enrolled. No site was associated with an increased risk of infection compared with the other sites, with hazard ratios of 0.951 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.612-1.478) for the SC site, 0.956 (95% CI, 0.593-1.541) for the IJ site, and 1.120 (95% CI, 0.753-1.665) for the femoral site. No significant association between mortality and presence of CVC infection was found when adjusted for age, severity of illness, and duration of CVC placement. An association was found between the presence of a CVC infection and prolonged PICU length of stay (3.98 days longer; P < .001).
Femoral CVCs are not associated with higher rates of infection in the PICU. In addition, the presence of CVC infection does not affect mortality, but is associated with longer PICU admission.
成人数据显示,中心静脉导管(CVC)在三个主要部位的感染率存在差异:锁骨下(SC)、颈内(IJ)和股静脉。我们假设在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的患者中,这三个部位的 CVC 感染率没有差异,但具体而言,股静脉与所有其他部位相比,感染率更高。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,从 1999 年 1 月至 2008 年 1 月,前瞻性地收集了内部审查和质量保证的数据。所有接受 CVC 的 PICU 患者均被纳入研究。使用 Cox 回归生存分析确定 CVC 感染率,以考虑到不同部位 CVC 放置的不同持续时间,然后根据疾病严重程度、管腔数量和患者年龄进行调整。比较了有 CVC 感染的患者与无 CVC 感染的患者的死亡率。
共纳入 4512 例接受 CVC 的患者。与其他部位相比,没有任何部位的感染风险增加,SC 部位的危险比为 0.951(95%置信区间[CI],0.612-1.478),IJ 部位为 0.956(95%CI,0.593-1.541),股静脉部位为 1.120(95%CI,0.753-1.665)。当调整年龄、疾病严重程度和 CVC 放置时间后,发现 CVC 感染与死亡率之间没有显著关联。发现 CVC 感染与 PICU 住院时间延长之间存在关联(延长 3.98 天;P<.001)。
股静脉 CVC 与 PICU 内更高的感染率无关。此外,CVC 感染的存在并不影响死亡率,但与 PICU 住院时间延长有关。