• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[使用SITA标准评估早期青光眼性视野缺损的安德森标准]

[Anderson criteria in early glaucomatous visual field defects with the SITA Standard].

作者信息

Suzumura Hirotaka, Yoshikawa Keiji, Kimura Tairo, Yamazaki Sei

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Nakano General Hospital, 4-59-16 Chuo, Nakano-ku, Tokyo 164-8607, Japan.

出版信息

Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2011 May;115(5):435-9.

PMID:21706836
Abstract

PURPOSE

We evaluated the positive rate of the Anderson criteria of suspected early glaucomatous visual field defects (GVFDs).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Ninety-six eyes of 96 patients, who had suspected primary open-angle glaucoma with apparent glaucomatous optic disc changes and who had more than -6.0 dB of mean deviation (MD) with Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Standard (SITA-S) Central 30-2 program in the Humphrey Field Analyzer, were selected. We applied the Anderson criteria and calculated the positive rates for these criteria and for three elements pattern deviation probability plots (PD plots), glaucoma hemifield test (GHT), pattern standard deviation (PSD).

RESULTS

The positive rate of the Anderson criteria was 78.1% and the PD plots (77.1%) were significantly higher rate than the GHT (62.5%) or the PSD (63.5%). The positive rate of the Anderson criteria was 100% in the MD of less than -3.0 dB and was 65.6% even in the MD of more than -3 dB (p < 0.0001). On the other hand, 57.9% of the eyes with an MD between -2 dB and -1 dB showed positive in all elements. At more than -1.0 dB of MD, the PD plots (50.0%) were significantly higher than the PSD (18.8%) or the GHT (21.9%) (PSD: p = 0.0085, GHT : p = 0.0190).

CONCLUSION

Using the SITA-S, the Anderson criteria showed a high positive rate in eyes with suspected early GVFDs.

摘要

目的

我们评估了安德森标准对疑似早期青光眼视野缺损(GVFD)的阳性率。

对象与方法

选取96例患者的96只眼,这些患者疑似原发性开角型青光眼,有明显的青光眼性视盘改变,且在Humphrey视野分析仪中使用瑞典交互式阈值算法标准(SITA-S)中央30-2程序测得平均偏差(MD)超过-6.0 dB。我们应用安德森标准,并计算这些标准以及三个要素模式偏差概率图(PD图)、青光眼半视野检测(GHT)、模式标准差(PSD)的阳性率。

结果

安德森标准的阳性率为78.1%,PD图(77.1%)的阳性率显著高于GHT(62.5%)或PSD(63.5%)。MD小于-3.0 dB时安德森标准的阳性率为100%,即使MD超过-3 dB时阳性率仍为65.6%(p < 0.0001)。另一方面,MD在-2 dB至-1 dB之间的眼中,57.9%在所有要素中均显示阳性。MD超过-1.0 dB时,PD图(50.0%)的阳性率显著高于PSD(18.8%)或GHT(21.9%)(PSD:p = 0.0085,GHT:p = 0.0190)。

结论

使用SITA-S时,安德森标准在疑似早期GVFD的眼中显示出较高的阳性率。

相似文献

1
[Anderson criteria in early glaucomatous visual field defects with the SITA Standard].[使用SITA标准评估早期青光眼性视野缺损的安德森标准]
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2011 May;115(5):435-9.
2
Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms.使用标准全阈值和瑞典交互式阈值算法比较青光眼性视野缺损
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Sep;120(9):1136-41. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.9.1136.
3
Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.瑞典交互式阈值算法对青光眼性视野缺损的敏感性和特异性。
Ophthalmology. 2002 Jun;109(6):1052-8. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01047-3.
4
Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.使用矩阵视野计和标准消色差视野计比较视野缺损情况。
Ophthalmology. 2007 Mar;114(3):480-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.009. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
5
Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.高危眼压升高和早期青光眼患者的多焦视觉诱发电位与标准自动视野计比较
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Mar;48(3):1173-80. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0561.
6
Sensitivity and specificity of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials (SD-tVEP) in discriminating normal from glaucomatous eyes.短潜伏期瞬态视觉诱发电位(SD-tVEP)在区分正常眼与青光眼眼中的敏感性和特异性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Apr 23;54(4):2847-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10097.
7
Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm.使用SITA算法的Humphrey视野分析仪II周边视野计评估假阳性结果。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Oct;47(10):4632-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1598.
8
Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.倍频视野检查法:与标准自动视野检查法在检测青光眼方面的比较
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Feb;143(2):263-271. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.10.033. Epub 2006 Nov 27.
9
Reversal of Glaucoma Hemifield Test Results and Visual Field Features in Glaucoma.青光眼视野测试结果逆转与视野特征
Ophthalmology. 2018 Mar;125(3):352-360. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
10
Assessing Precision of Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson Criteria for Staging Early Glaucomatous Damage in an Ocular Hypertension Cohort: A Retrospective Study.评估霍达普-帕里什-安德森标准在高眼压症队列中分期早期青光眼性损害的准确性:一项回顾性研究。
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2017 Jan-Feb;6(1):21-27. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000201.