Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Lancet. 2011 Jul 30;378(9789):412-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60886-6. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
The immunopathogenesis of type 1 diabetes mellitus is associated with T-cell autoimmunity. To be fully active, immune T cells need a co-stimulatory signal in addition to the main antigen-driven signal. Abatacept modulates co-stimulation and prevents full T-cell activation. We evaluated the effect of abatacept in recent-onset type 1 diabetes.
In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, patients aged 6-45 years recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive abatacept (10 mg/kg, maximum 1000 mg per dose) or placebo infusions intravenously on days 1, 14, 28, and monthly for a total of 27 infusions over 2 years. Computer-generated permuted block randomisation was used, with a block size of 3 and stratified by participating site. Neither patients nor research personnel were aware of treatment assignments. The primary outcome was baseline-adjusted geometric mean 2-h area-under-the-curve (AUC) serum C-peptide concentration after a mixed-meal tolerance test at 2 years' follow-up. Analysis was by intention to treat for all patients for whom data were available. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00505375.
112 patients were assigned to treatment groups (77 abatacept, 35 placebo). Adjusted C-peptide AUC was 59% (95% CI 6·1-112) higher at 2 years with abatacept (n=73, 0·378 nmol/L) than with placebo (n=30, 0·238 nmol/L; p=0·0029). The difference between groups was present throughout the trial, with an estimated 9·6 months' delay (95% CI 3·47-15·6) in C-peptide reduction with abatacept. There were few infusion-related adverse events (36 reactions occurred in 17 [22%] patients on abatacept and 11 reactions in six [17%] on placebo). There was no increase in infections (32 [42%] patients on abatacept vs 15 [43%] on placebo) or neutropenia (seven [9%] vs five [14%]).
Co-stimulation modulation with abatacept slowed reduction in β-cell function over 2 years. The beneficial effect suggests that T-cell activation still occurs around the time of clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. Yet, despite continued administration of abatacept over 24 months, the decrease in β-cell function with abatacept was parallel to that with placebo after 6 months of treatment, causing us to speculate that T-cell activation lessens with time. Further observation will establish whether the beneficial effect continues after cessation of abatacept infusions.
US National Institutes of Health.
1 型糖尿病的免疫发病机制与 T 细胞自身免疫有关。为了充分发挥活性,免疫 T 细胞除了主要的抗原驱动信号外,还需要一个共刺激信号。阿巴西普调节共刺激作用,防止 T 细胞完全激活。我们评估了阿巴西普在新发 1 型糖尿病中的作用。
在这项多中心、双盲、随机对照试验中,年龄在 6-45 岁之间的近期诊断为 1 型糖尿病的患者被随机(2:1)分配接受阿巴西普(10mg/kg,最大剂量为 1000mg/剂)或安慰剂静脉输注,在第 1、14、28 天以及每月一次,共 27 次输注,持续 2 年。采用计算机生成的随机化排列块,块大小为 3,按参与地点分层。患者和研究人员均不知道治疗分配情况。主要结局是在 2 年随访时混合餐耐量试验后的基线调整几何平均 2 小时血清 C 肽浓度(AUC)。对所有可获得数据的患者进行意向治疗分析。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT00505375。
112 名患者被分配到治疗组(77 名阿巴西普,35 名安慰剂)。与安慰剂组(n=30,0.238nmol/L)相比,阿巴西普组(n=73,0.378nmol/L)在 2 年时的 C 肽 AUC 增加了 59%(95%CI6·1-112)(p=0.0029)。两组之间的差异在整个试验过程中均存在,阿巴西普组 C 肽减少的时间延迟了 9.6 个月(95%CI3.47-15.6)。输注相关不良反应较少(阿巴西普组 17 名[22%]患者发生 36 次反应,安慰剂组 6 名[17%]患者发生 11 次反应)。感染(阿巴西普组 32 名[42%]患者 vs 安慰剂组 15 名[43%]患者)或中性粒细胞减少症(阿巴西普组 7 名[9%]患者 vs 安慰剂组 5 名[14%]患者)无增加。
阿巴西普的共刺激调节作用减缓了 2 年内 β 细胞功能的下降。这种有益的影响表明 T 细胞激活仍发生在 1 型糖尿病临床诊断的同时。然而,尽管在 24 个月内持续给予阿巴西普,在治疗 6 个月后,阿巴西普组和安慰剂组的β细胞功能下降是平行的,这使我们推测 T 细胞激活会随着时间的推移而减轻。进一步的观察将确定在停止阿巴西普输注后,这种有益的效果是否会持续。
美国国立卫生研究院。