Suppr超能文献

血液透析患者坐-站-坐测试、6 分钟步行测试、单腿跟腱抬高测试和握力的重测信度和最小可检测变化分数。

Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change scores for sit-to-stand-to-sit tests, the six-minute walk test, the one-leg heel-rise test, and handgrip strength in people undergoing hemodialysis.

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera, Avda Seminario s/n, 46113 Moncada, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2011 Aug;91(8):1244-52. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100141. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Determining the relative and absolute reliability of outcomes of physical performance tests for people undergoing hemodialysis is necessary to discriminate between the true effects of exercise interventions and the inherent variability of this cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to assess the relative reliability of sit-to-stand-to-sit tests (the STS-10, which measures the time [in seconds] required to complete 10 full stands from a sitting position, and the STS-60, which measures the number of repetitions achieved in 60 seconds), the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), the one-leg heel-rise test, and the handgrip strength test and to calculate minimal detectable change (MDC) scores in people undergoing hemodialysis.

DESIGN

This study was a prospective, nonexperimental investigation.

METHODS

Thirty-nine people undergoing hemodialysis at 2 clinics in Spain were contacted. Study participants performed the STS-10 (n=37), the STS-60 (n=37), and the 6MWT (n=36). At one of the settings, the participants also performed the one-leg heel-rise test (n=21) and the handgrip strength test (n=12) on both the right and the left sides. Participants attended 2 testing sessions 1 to 2 weeks apart.

RESULTS

High intraclass correlation coefficients (≥.88) were found for all tests, suggesting good relative reliability. The MDC scores at 90% confidence intervals were as follows: 8.4 seconds for the STS-10, 4 repetitions for the STS-60, 66.3 m for the 6MWT, 3.4 kg for handgrip strength (force-generating capacity), 3.7 repetitions for the one-leg heel-rise test with the right leg, and 5.2 repetitions for the one-leg heel-rise test with the left leg. Limitations A limited sample of patients was used in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The STS-16, STS-60, 6MWT, one-leg heel rise test, and handgrip strength test are reliable outcome measures. The MDC scores at 90% confidence intervals for these tests will help to determine whether a change is due to error or to an intervention.

摘要

背景

确定接受血液透析人群的身体机能测试结果的相对和绝对可靠性,对于区分运动干预的真实效果和该队列的固有变异性是必要的。

目的

本研究旨在评估坐-站-坐测试(STS-10,测量完成 10 次全坐立所需的时间[秒],STS-60,测量 60 秒内完成的重复次数)、六分钟步行测试(6MWT)、单腿足跟抬高测试和握力测试的相对可靠性,并计算接受血液透析人群的最小可检测变化(MDC)评分。

设计

本研究为前瞻性非实验性研究。

方法

联系了西班牙 2 家诊所的 39 名接受血液透析的患者。研究参与者完成了 STS-10(n=37)、STS-60(n=37)和 6MWT(n=36)。在其中一个地点,参与者还在右侧和左侧的 21 次单腿足跟抬高测试(n=21)和 12 次握力测试(n=12)。参与者在 1 到 2 周内参加了 2 次测试。

结果

所有测试的组内相关系数均较高(≥.88),表明具有良好的相对可靠性。90%置信区间的 MDC 评分为:STS-10 为 8.4 秒,STS-60 为 4 次重复,6MWT 为 66.3 米,握力(产生力量的能力)为 3.4 千克,右腿单腿足跟抬高测试为 3.7 次重复,左腿单腿足跟抬高测试为 5.2 次重复。局限性 本研究仅使用了有限的患者样本。

结论

STS-16、STS-60、6MWT、单腿足跟抬高测试和握力测试是可靠的结果测量指标。这些测试的 90%置信区间 MDC 评分将有助于确定变化是由于误差还是干预引起的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验