Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST) , Montréal , Québec , Canada.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011 Aug;8(8):467-72. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2011.590740.
Dust accumulation in the components of heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems is a potential source of contaminants. To date, very little information is available on recognized methods for assessing dust buildup in these systems. The few existing methods are either objective in nature, involving numerical values, or subjective in nature, based on experts' judgments. An earlier project aimed at assessing different methods of sampling dust in ducts was carried out in the laboratories of the Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST). This laboratory study showed that all the sampling methods were practicable, provided that a specific surface-dust cleaning initiation criterion was used for each method. However, these conclusions were reached on the basis of ideal conditions in a laboratory using a reference dust. The objective of this present study was to validate these laboratory results in the field. To this end, the laboratory sampling templates were replicated in real ducts and the three sampling methods (the IRSST method, the method of the U.S. organization National Air Duct Cleaner Association [NADCA] and that of the French organization Association pour la Prévention et l'Étude de la Contamination [ASPEC]) were used simultaneously in a statistically representative number of systems. The air return and supply ducts were also compared. Cleaning initiation criteria under real conditions were found to be 6.0 mg/100 cm(2) using the IRSST method, 2.0 mg/100 cm(2) using the NADCA method, and 23 mg/100 cm(2) using the ASPEC method. In the laboratory study, the criteria using the same methods were 6.0 for the IRSST method, 2.0 for the NADCA method, and 3.0 for the ASPEC method. The laboratory criteria for the IRSST and NADCA methods were therefore validated in the field. The ASPEC criterion was the only one to change. The ASPEC method therefore allows for the most accurate evaluation of dust accumulation in HVAC ductwork. We therefore recommend using the latter method to objectively assess dust accumulation levels in HVAC ductwork.
加热、通风和空调 (HVAC) 系统组件中的灰尘积聚是污染物的潜在来源。迄今为止,关于评估这些系统中灰尘积聚的公认方法的信息非常有限。现有的少数方法要么是客观的,涉及数值,要么是主观的,基于专家的判断。早些时候,一个旨在评估管道中灰尘采样不同方法的项目在 Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST) 的实验室进行。这项实验室研究表明,所有的采样方法都是可行的,只要为每种方法使用特定的表面灰尘清洁启动标准。然而,这些结论是基于实验室中使用参考灰尘的理想条件得出的。本研究的目的是在现场验证这些实验室结果。为此,实验室采样模板在实际管道中进行了复制,并同时使用 IRSST 方法、美国国家空气管道清洁协会 (NADCA) 方法和法国污染预防与研究协会 (ASPEC) 方法对三种采样方法进行了统计代表性数量的系统。还比较了空气回风管道和送风管道。在实际条件下,发现 IRSST 方法的清洁启动标准为 6.0mg/100cm²,NADCA 方法为 2.0mg/100cm²,ASPEC 方法为 23mg/100cm²。在实验室研究中,使用相同方法的标准为 IRSST 方法 6.0、NADCA 方法 2.0 和 ASPEC 方法 3.0。因此,IRSST 和 NADCA 方法的实验室标准在现场得到了验证。只有 ASPEC 标准发生了变化。因此,ASPEC 方法可以最准确地评估 HVAC 管道中的灰尘积聚。因此,我们建议使用后一种方法客观评估 HVAC 管道中的灰尘积聚水平。