Chen Shih-Jen, Kuo Li-Tang, Wang Chao-Hung, Cherng Wen-Jin, Yang Ning-I, Cheng Chi-Wen
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chang Gung Med J. 2011 May-Jun;34(3):268-77.
Computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTA) is a non-invasive alternative to conventional coronary angiography (CCA) in detecting chronic coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the value of CTA in estimating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not been evaluated.
CTA and CCA were performed on 10 patients with non-ST-elevated AMI and 17 patients with stable angina pectoris. The plaque components and stenosis severity were assessed by both modalities to clarify the diagnostic values of CTA in AMI and stable angina pectoris.
A high total coronary artery calcium (CAC) score was significantly correlated with the presence of CAD and the target lesion CAC score (p < 0.01). The AMI group tended to have a lower target CAC score (p = 0.10) and target plaque burden (p = 0.27), compared to the stable angina pectoris group. To estimate the coronary artery stenotic severity, CTA and CCA had concordant correlations in all segments, except in the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) artery. The calcium score and calcification fraction percentage in the proximal LAD artery were significantly higher than those of other segments (p < 0.01). Compared to CCA, CTA overestimated the severity of stenosis in the proximal LAD arterial segment in the stable angina pectoris group (p = 0.028), but not in the AMI group.
CTA has diagnostic values similar to those of CCA in detecting coronary lesions in patients with AMI or stable angina pectoris. However, a high level of plaque CAC in the stable angina pectoris group may lead to an overestimation of the severity of coronary stenosis, especially in the proximal LAD arterial segment. Although less remarkable, the impact of CAC on the diagnostic value of CTA was still substantial in patients with AMI.
在检测慢性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)方面,计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影(CTA)是传统冠状动脉造影(CCA)的一种非侵入性替代方法。然而,CTA在评估急性心肌梗死(AMI)方面的价值尚未得到评估。
对10例非ST段抬高型AMI患者和17例稳定型心绞痛患者进行了CTA和CCA检查。通过这两种方法评估斑块成分和狭窄严重程度,以阐明CTA在AMI和稳定型心绞痛中的诊断价值。
高冠状动脉总钙化(CAC)评分与CAD的存在及靶病变CAC评分显著相关(p<0.01)。与稳定型心绞痛组相比,AMI组的靶CAC评分(p = 0.10)和靶斑块负荷(p = 0.27)往往较低。为评估冠状动脉狭窄严重程度,除左前降支(LAD)近端动脉外,CTA和CCA在所有节段均具有一致的相关性。LAD近端动脉的钙化评分和钙化分数百分比显著高于其他节段(p<0.01)。与CCA相比,CTA高估了稳定型心绞痛组LAD近端动脉节段的狭窄严重程度(p = 0.028),但在AMI组中未出现这种情况。
在检测AMI或稳定型心绞痛患者的冠状动脉病变方面,CTA具有与CCA相似的诊断价值。然而,稳定型心绞痛组中高水平的斑块CAC可能导致对冠状动脉狭窄严重程度的高估,尤其是在LAD近端动脉节段。虽然不太显著,但CAC对CTA诊断价值的影响在AMI患者中仍然很大。