Department of Biology, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020868. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
Whether anthropogenic mortality is additive or compensatory to natural mortality in animal populations has long been a question of theoretical and practical importance. Theoretically, under density-dependent conditions populations compensate for anthropogenic mortality through decreases in natural mortality and/or increases in productivity, but recent studies of large carnivores suggest that anthropogenic mortality can be fully additive to natural mortality and thereby constrain annual survival and population growth rate. Nevertheless, mechanisms underlying either compensatory or additive effects continue to be poorly understood. Using long-term data on a reintroduced population of the red wolf, we tested for evidence of additive vs. compensatory effects of anthropogenic mortality on annual survival and population growth rates, and the preservation and reproductive success of breeding pairs. We found that anthropogenic mortality had a strong additive effect on annual survival and population growth rate at low population density, though there was evidence for compensation in population growth at high density. When involving the death of a breeder, anthropogenic mortality was also additive to natural rates of breeding pair dissolution, resulting in a net decrease in the annual preservation of existing breeding pairs. However, though the disbanding of a pack following death of a breeder resulted in fewer recruits per litter relative to stable packs, there was no relationship between natural rates of pair dissolution and population growth rate at either high or low density. Thus we propose that short-term additive effects of anthropogenic mortality on population growth in the red wolf population at low density were primarily a result of direct mortality of adults rather than indirect socially-mediated effects resulting in reduced recruitment. Finally, we also demonstrate that per capita recruitment and the proportion of adults that became reproductive declined steeply with increasing population density, suggesting that there is potential for density-dependent compensation of anthropogenically-mediated population regulation.
人为因素导致的死亡率对动物种群的自然死亡率是具有附加作用还是补偿作用,长期以来一直是一个理论和实际都非常重要的问题。从理论上讲,在密度依赖的条件下,种群通过降低自然死亡率和/或提高生产力来补偿人为因素导致的死亡率,但最近对大型食肉动物的研究表明,人为因素导致的死亡率可能完全附加于自然死亡率,从而限制了每年的存活率和种群增长率。然而,对于补偿或附加效应的机制仍知之甚少。本研究使用了关于重新引入的红狼种群的长期数据,检验了人为因素导致的死亡率对每年的存活率和种群增长率、繁殖对的保存和繁殖成功率的附加效应与补偿效应的证据。研究结果表明,在低密度下,人为因素导致的死亡率对每年的存活率和种群增长率具有很强的附加效应,尽管在高密度下存在种群增长的补偿证据。当涉及到繁殖者的死亡时,人为因素导致的死亡率也会对繁殖对的自然解散率产生附加作用,从而导致现有的繁殖对每年的保存率净下降。然而,尽管由于繁殖者的死亡导致狼群解散,每窝的新成员相对稳定的狼群有所减少,但在高密度或低密度下,繁殖对的自然解散率与种群增长率之间没有关系。因此,研究人员提出,在低密度下,人为因素导致的死亡率对红狼种群的短期附加效应,主要是由于成年个体的直接死亡,而不是由于间接的社会介导效应导致的招募减少。最后,研究人员还证明,人均招募和成为繁殖者的成年人比例随着种群密度的增加而急剧下降,这表明人为介导的种群调节存在密度依赖的补偿潜力。