Division of Gastroenterology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep;74(3):610-624.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
BACKGROUND: Colon cancer screening with colonoscopy is an accepted strategy; however, there are limited data regarding the cost-effectiveness of screening for upper GI cancers (esophageal adenocarcinoma with its premalignant precursor Barrett's esophagus, esophageal squamous cell cancer, gastric adenocarcinoma) in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening the general population for upper GI cancers by performing an upper endoscopy at the time of screening colonoscopy. DESIGN: Decision analysis. SETTING: Third-party-payer perspective with a time horizon of 30 years or until death. PATIENTS: This study involved 50-year-old patients already undergoing screening colonoscopy. INTERVENTION: Comparison of two strategies: performing and not performing a screening upper endoscopy at the time of screening colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS: One-time screening for the general population at the age of 50 for upper GI cancers required $115,664 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) compared with no screening or surveillance. A strategy of screening and surveillance for Barrett's esophagus required only $95,559 per QALY saved. In 1-way sensitivity analyses, the prevalence rates of esophageal adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell cancer, or gastric adenocarcinoma would have to increase by 654%, 1948%, and 337%, respectively, to generate an ICER of less than $50,000 per QALY. LIMITATIONS: Omission of premalignant conditions for squamous cell cancer and gastric adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: The ICER for screening the general population for upper GI cancers with endoscopy remains high, despite accounting for reduced endoscopy costs and the combined benefits of detecting early esophageal adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell cancer, and gastric adenocarcinoma. However, the ICER compares favorably with commonly performed screening strategies for other cancers.
背景:结肠镜检查进行结肠癌筛查是一种被接受的策略;然而,在美国,有关筛查上消化道癌症(食管腺癌及其癌前病变巴雷特食管、食管鳞状细胞癌、胃腺癌)的成本效益的数据有限。
目的:通过在筛查结肠镜检查时进行上消化道内镜检查,评估对一般人群进行上消化道癌症筛查的成本效益。
设计:决策分析。
设置:第三方支付者视角,时间范围为 30 年或直至死亡。
患者:本研究涉及已经接受筛查结肠镜检查的 50 岁患者。
干预:比较两种策略:在筛查结肠镜检查时进行或不进行筛查性上消化道内镜检查。
主要观察指标:增量成本效益比(ICER)。
结果:与不筛查或不监测相比,对 50 岁人群进行一次性上消化道癌症筛查需要每获得 1 个质量调整生命年(QALY)花费 115664 美元。筛查和监测巴雷特食管的策略仅需要每节省 1 个 QALY 花费 95559 美元。在单向敏感性分析中,食管腺癌、食管鳞状细胞癌或胃腺癌的患病率分别需要增加 654%、1948%和 337%,才能产生每 QALY 低于 50000 美元的 ICER。
局限性:未考虑鳞状细胞癌和胃腺癌的癌前病变。
结论:尽管考虑到降低内镜检查成本以及早期发现食管腺癌、食管鳞状细胞癌和胃腺癌的联合效益,但使用内镜对一般人群进行上消化道癌症筛查的 ICER 仍然很高。然而,与其他常见的癌症筛查策略相比,ICER 具有优势。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011-7-13
Am J Gastroenterol. 1999-8
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007-3
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007-3
Dig Dis. 2009
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006-6
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008-9
Front Public Health. 2025-8-14
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2025-3
DEN Open. 2025-5-26
Cancers (Basel). 2024-6-27
Cancer Cell Int. 2024-1-6
Gastroenterology. 2024-2