文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

普通人群上消化道癌筛查的内镜检查:成本效用分析。

Endoscopy for upper GI cancer screening in the general population: a cost-utility analysis.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep;74(3):610-624.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 Jul 13.


DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2011.05.001
PMID:21741639
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer screening with colonoscopy is an accepted strategy; however, there are limited data regarding the cost-effectiveness of screening for upper GI cancers (esophageal adenocarcinoma with its premalignant precursor Barrett's esophagus, esophageal squamous cell cancer, gastric adenocarcinoma) in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening the general population for upper GI cancers by performing an upper endoscopy at the time of screening colonoscopy. DESIGN: Decision analysis. SETTING: Third-party-payer perspective with a time horizon of 30 years or until death. PATIENTS: This study involved 50-year-old patients already undergoing screening colonoscopy. INTERVENTION: Comparison of two strategies: performing and not performing a screening upper endoscopy at the time of screening colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS: One-time screening for the general population at the age of 50 for upper GI cancers required $115,664 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) compared with no screening or surveillance. A strategy of screening and surveillance for Barrett's esophagus required only $95,559 per QALY saved. In 1-way sensitivity analyses, the prevalence rates of esophageal adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell cancer, or gastric adenocarcinoma would have to increase by 654%, 1948%, and 337%, respectively, to generate an ICER of less than $50,000 per QALY. LIMITATIONS: Omission of premalignant conditions for squamous cell cancer and gastric adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: The ICER for screening the general population for upper GI cancers with endoscopy remains high, despite accounting for reduced endoscopy costs and the combined benefits of detecting early esophageal adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell cancer, and gastric adenocarcinoma. However, the ICER compares favorably with commonly performed screening strategies for other cancers.

摘要

背景:结肠镜检查进行结肠癌筛查是一种被接受的策略;然而,在美国,有关筛查上消化道癌症(食管腺癌及其癌前病变巴雷特食管、食管鳞状细胞癌、胃腺癌)的成本效益的数据有限。

目的:通过在筛查结肠镜检查时进行上消化道内镜检查,评估对一般人群进行上消化道癌症筛查的成本效益。

设计:决策分析。

设置:第三方支付者视角,时间范围为 30 年或直至死亡。

患者:本研究涉及已经接受筛查结肠镜检查的 50 岁患者。

干预:比较两种策略:在筛查结肠镜检查时进行或不进行筛查性上消化道内镜检查。

主要观察指标:增量成本效益比(ICER)。

结果:与不筛查或不监测相比,对 50 岁人群进行一次性上消化道癌症筛查需要每获得 1 个质量调整生命年(QALY)花费 115664 美元。筛查和监测巴雷特食管的策略仅需要每节省 1 个 QALY 花费 95559 美元。在单向敏感性分析中,食管腺癌、食管鳞状细胞癌或胃腺癌的患病率分别需要增加 654%、1948%和 337%,才能产生每 QALY 低于 50000 美元的 ICER。

局限性:未考虑鳞状细胞癌和胃腺癌的癌前病变。

结论:尽管考虑到降低内镜检查成本以及早期发现食管腺癌、食管鳞状细胞癌和胃腺癌的联合效益,但使用内镜对一般人群进行上消化道癌症筛查的 ICER 仍然很高。然而,与其他常见的癌症筛查策略相比,ICER 具有优势。

相似文献

[1]
Endoscopy for upper GI cancer screening in the general population: a cost-utility analysis.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011-7-13

[2]
Barrett's esophagus: a new look at surveillance based on emerging estimates of cancer risk.

Am J Gastroenterol. 1999-8

[3]
Cost-benefit analysis of capsule endoscopy compared with standard upper endoscopy for the detection of Barrett's esophagus.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007-3

[4]
Cost utility of screening for Barrett's esophagus with esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007-3

[5]
An economic analysis of endoscopic ablative therapy for management of nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

Endoscopy. 2009-5

[6]
Screening and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus.

Dig Dis. 2009

[7]
Health benefits and cost effectiveness of endoscopic and nonendoscopic cytosponge screening for Barrett's esophagus.

Gastroenterology. 2012-10-3

[8]
Endoscopic screening for gastric cancer.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006-6

[9]
Barrett's esophagus: a retrospective analysis of 13 years surveillance.

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008-9

[10]
Are screening and surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus really worthwhile?

Gut. 2005-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Cost-utility of endoscopic screening strategies for upper gastrointestinal cancer across China: a modeling study.

Front Public Health. 2025-8-14

[2]
Cost effectiveness analysis of Barrett's esophagus screening: A systematic review.

Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2025-3

[3]
Current Status of Gastric Cancer Screening and Future Perspectives.

DEN Open. 2025-5-26

[4]
Detection of a novel DNA methylation marker panel for esophageal cancer diagnosis using circulating tumor DNA.

BMC Cancer. 2024-12-26

[5]
Applying machine learning techniques to predict the risk of distant metastasis from gastric cancer: a real world retrospective study.

Front Oncol. 2024-12-5

[6]
A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies on Gastric Cancer Screening.

Cancers (Basel). 2024-6-27

[7]
Racial disparities of gastric cancer in the USA: an overview of epidemiology, global screening guidelines, and targeted screening in a heterogeneous population.

Gastric Cancer. 2024-5

[8]
Clinical applications and perspectives of circulating tumor DNA in gastric cancer.

Cancer Cell Int. 2024-1-6

[9]
Missed Opportunities: the Timing and Frequency of Screening Colonoscopy in Patients That Develop Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

J Gastrointest Surg. 2023-12

[10]
Evolving Concepts in Helicobacter pylori Management.

Gastroenterology. 2024-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索