Suppr超能文献

回顾性病例系列分析在英国一家专业区域过敏诊所进行的青霉素过敏测试。

Retrospective case series analysis of penicillin allergy testing in a UK specialist regional allergy clinic.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Immunology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Pathol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1014-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2010.088203. Epub 2011 Jul 8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Penicillin allergy is the most common drug allergy. Skin testing for the major (PPL) and minor determinants (MDMs) of penicillin offers increased sensitivity and specificity over in vitro testing alone. Following a worldwide absence of reagents, a new kit was licensed in the UK in 2008 (Diater, Spain) and this report evaluates its use in a UK specialist allergy clinic.

METHODS

Prospective data on 50 consecutive patients tested with the new reagents were collected. The departmental protocol is adapted from the 2003 EAACI position paper.

RESULTS

14% (7/50) and 12% (6/50) of patients were diagnosed with immediate and non-immediate reactions respectively. The negative predictive value of the PPL and MDM reagents at the neat concentration for an immediate reaction was 93% (true negatives 37, false negatives 3). Two patients experienced systemic reactions to DPT in the absence of demonstrable specific IgE. None of the patients were diagnosed using skin prick testing alone or at lower concentrations of IDT. Five patients were diagnosed at the IDT stage and two at the DPT stage in the absence of demonstrable specific IgE. Six patients were diagnosed with non-immediate reactions, two on IDT alone and four following IDT and DPT.

CONCLUSION

The new PPL and MDM determinants offer enhanced sensitivity when evaluating β-lactam hypersensitivity; however, there are limitations to the current testing regimens. The UK would benefit from local guidelines, which incorporate the new reagents and acknowledge the high amoxicillin prescription rate and the relatively lower specialist-to-patient ratio in this country.

摘要

简介

青霉素过敏是最常见的药物过敏。与单独进行体外检测相比,对青霉素的主要(PPL)和次要决定因素(MDMs)进行皮肤测试可提高敏感性和特异性。在全球范围内缺乏试剂后,新试剂盒于 2008 年在英国获得许可(西班牙 Diater),本报告评估了其在英国专科过敏诊所的使用情况。

方法

收集了 50 例连续接受新试剂检测的患者的前瞻性数据。该部门的方案是根据 2003 年 EAACI 立场文件改编的。

结果

分别有 14%(7/50)和 12%(6/50)的患者被诊断为立即和非立即反应。PPL 和 MDM 试剂在纯浓度下对立即反应的阴性预测值为 93%(真阴性 37,假阴性 3)。两名患者在未检测到特异性 IgE 的情况下对 DPT 产生全身反应。单独进行皮肤点刺试验或在较低 IDT 浓度下,均未诊断出任何患者。在缺乏可检测的特异性 IgE 的情况下,有 5 名患者在 IDT 阶段和 2 名患者在 DPT 阶段被诊断。有 6 名患者被诊断为非立即反应,2 名患者仅在 IDT 上,4 名患者在 IDT 和 DPT 后。

结论

新型 PPL 和 MDM 决定因素在评估β-内酰胺类药物过敏时提供了更高的敏感性;然而,当前的检测方案存在局限性。英国将受益于当地的指南,这些指南应纳入新试剂,并承认英国的阿莫西青霉素处方率较高,以及专科医生与患者的比例相对较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验