School of Nursing, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, USA.
J Nurs Educ. 2011 Oct;50(10):583-6. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20110715-02. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
Human patient simulation (HPS) is increasingly being used as both a teaching and an evaluation strategy in nursing education. To meaningfully evaluate student performance in HPS activities, nurse educators must be equipped with valid and reliable instruments for measuring student performance. This study used a novel method, including leveled, video-archived simulation scenarios, a virtual classroom, and webinar and e-mail communication, to assess the reliability and internal consistency of data produced using the Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument. The interrater reliability, calculated using intraclass correlation (2,1) and 95% confidence interval, was 0.952 (0.697, 0.993). The intrarater reliability, calculated using intraclass correlation (3,1) and 95% confidence interval, was 0.883 (-0.001, 0.992), and the internal consistency, calculated using Cronbach's alpha, was α = 0.979. This article includes a sample of the instrument and provides valuable resources and reliability data for nurse educators and researchers interested in measuring student performance in HPS activities.
在护理教育中,人体患者模拟(HPS)正越来越多地被用作教学和评估策略。为了有意义地评估学生在 HPS 活动中的表现,护士教育者必须配备用于衡量学生表现的有效且可靠的工具。本研究采用了一种新方法,包括分级、视频存档的模拟场景、虚拟教室以及网络研讨会和电子邮件交流,来评估使用克里顿模拟评估工具产生的数据的可靠性和内部一致性。使用组内相关系数(2,1)和 95%置信区间计算的评分者间可靠性为 0.952(0.697, 0.993)。使用组内相关系数(3,1)和 95%置信区间计算的评分者内可靠性为 0.883(-0.001, 0.992),使用 Cronbach 的 alpha 计算的内部一致性为α=0.979。本文包括该工具的示例,并为有兴趣衡量学生在 HPS 活动中的表现的护士教育者和研究人员提供了有价值的资源和可靠性数据。