Department of Medicine II, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Horm Cancer. 2010 Dec;1(6):320-30. doi: 10.1007/s12672-010-0020-z.
The insulin analog glargine has a higher binding affinity than regular insulin for the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor in vitro, raising questions about increased mitogenicity in vivo. Observational studies in humans have recently reported a potential differential association between insulin glargine and malignancies, but available evidence remains inconclusive. We directly compared glargine vs. neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin's effects on cell proliferation in colonic mucosa and on formation of aberrant crypt foci in diabetic mice, i.e., early stages of colorectal cancer development. Mice (BKS.Cg-+Lepr(db)/+Lepr(db)/OlaHsd) were treated with insulin glargine (G), NPH insulin (NPH), or saline (NaCl). We assessed epithelial proliferation after long-term insulin treatment (18 weeks) by 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine and Ki67 staining and analyzed the formation of aberrant crypt foci (ACF) in mice treated with insulin glargine or NPH insulin or 10 weeks after initiation with 1,2-dimethylhydrazine. Insulin glargine treatment did not result in significantly different epithelial colonic proliferation compared to NPH insulin (G, 137 ± 22; NPH, 136 ± 15; NaCl, 100 ± 20 (relative proliferation index)), but both insulin-treated groups of mice had a higher proliferation index compared to the NaCl control group (p<0.001). Similarly, we observed no difference in ACF formation between glargine- and NPH-insulin-treated mice (G, 132 ± 12; NPH, 138 ± 9; NaCl, 100 ± 7 (relative number of ACF)), but ACF formation was significantly higher in insulin-treated mice than in NaCl-treated control mice (p=0.001). Chronic insulin treatment results in higher colonic epithelial proliferation and ACF formation, but the use of insulin glargine vs. NPH insulin is not associated with increased risk.
甘精胰岛素的体外结合亲和力比普通胰岛素更高,与胰岛素样生长因子 1 受体结合,这引发了关于体内增殖能力增加的问题。最近的人体观察性研究报告了甘精胰岛素和恶性肿瘤之间可能存在的差异关联,但现有证据仍不明确。我们直接比较了甘精胰岛素和中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH)胰岛素对糖尿病小鼠结肠黏膜细胞增殖和异常隐窝病灶(结直肠癌发展的早期阶段)形成的影响。将 BKS.Cg-+Lepr(db)/+Lepr(db)/OlaHsd 小鼠用甘精胰岛素(G)、NPH 胰岛素(NPH)或生理盐水(NaCl)处理。我们通过 5-溴-2'-脱氧尿苷和 Ki67 染色评估长期胰岛素治疗(18 周)后的上皮细胞增殖,并分析用甘精胰岛素或 NPH 胰岛素处理或用 1,2-二甲基肼起始 10 周后形成的异常隐窝病灶(ACF)。与 NPH 胰岛素相比,甘精胰岛素治疗并未导致结肠上皮细胞增殖有显著差异(G,137 ± 22;NPH,136 ± 15;NaCl,100 ± 20(相对增殖指数)),但与 NaCl 对照组相比,两种胰岛素治疗组的小鼠增殖指数均更高(p<0.001)。同样,我们也没有观察到甘精胰岛素和 NPH 胰岛素治疗的小鼠之间在 ACF 形成上存在差异(G,132 ± 12;NPH,138 ± 9;NaCl,100 ± 7(相对 ACF 数量)),但胰岛素治疗的小鼠的 ACF 形成明显高于 NaCl 治疗的对照组小鼠(p=0.001)。慢性胰岛素治疗会导致更高的结肠上皮细胞增殖和 ACF 形成,但使用甘精胰岛素而非 NPH 胰岛素并不会增加风险。