Suppr超能文献

肱骨近端骨折的锁定钢板固定:胸大肌三角肌入路与三角肌劈开入路的差异

Locked plating for proximal humeral fractures: differences between the deltopectoral and deltoid-splitting approaches.

作者信息

Wu Chin-Hsien, Ma Ching-Hou, Yeh James Jih-Hsi, Yen Cheng-Yo, Yu Shang-Won, Tu Yuan-Kun

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2011 Nov;71(5):1364-70. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31820d165d.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Locking proximal humerus plate (LPHP) fixation has recently become available for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. However, the preliminary results were contradictory. The technical requirements for success when using LPHP remain to be defined. Maybe the approach to the proximal humerus plays an important role, not the implants. We analyzed two surgical approaches to proximal humeral fractures.

METHODS

Between April 2004 and October 2007, 63 consecutive patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures who underwent LPHP osteosynthesis in our institute were classified to two treatment groups retrospectively: the deltopectoral incision and the deltoid-splitting incision according to surgeon's preference. The Constant and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores were recorded for clinical assessment. Quality of reduction, fracture union, and radiographic complications were recorded for radiographic assessment. Electrophysiological abnormalities were also assessed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to demographic data, preoperative radiographic findings, and duration of follow-up. There were also no significant differences between the groups with regard to operative time (p = 0.918), blood loss (p = 0.407), hospital stay (p = 0.431), postoperative head-shaft angle (p = 0.769), union time (p = 0.246), final head-shaft angle (p = 0.533), Constant score (p = 0.677), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (p = 0.833), radiographic complications (p = 1.000), and presence of electrophysiological abnormalities (p = 0.296). Avascular necrosis of the humeral head was found in three patients, all of whom in the deltopectoral approach group.

CONCLUSION

We found no statistically significant difference in clinical, radiographic, and electrophysiological outcomes between the deltopectoral approach and deltoid-splitting approach while surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

摘要

背景

锁定肱骨近端钢板(LPHP)固定术近来已用于治疗肱骨近端骨折。然而,初步结果存在矛盾。使用LPHP时成功的技术要求仍有待明确。或许肱骨近端的手术入路起重要作用,而非植入物。我们分析了两种治疗肱骨近端骨折的手术入路。

方法

2004年4月至2007年10月期间,在我院接受LPHP接骨术的63例连续性肱骨近端移位骨折患者,根据外科医生的偏好回顾性分为两个治疗组:三角肌胸大肌间沟入路组和三角肌劈开入路组。记录Constant和上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍评分以进行临床评估。记录复位质量、骨折愈合情况及影像学并发症以进行影像学评估。还评估了电生理异常情况。

结果

两组在人口统计学数据、术前影像学表现及随访时间方面无显著差异。两组在手术时间(p = 0.918)、失血量(p = 0.407)、住院时间(p = 0.431)、术后头干角(p = 0.769)、愈合时间(p = 0.246)、最终头干角(p = 0.533)、Constant评分(p = 0.677)、上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍评分(p = 0.833)、影像学并发症(p = 1.000)及电生理异常情况(p = 0.296)方面也无显著差异。3例患者出现肱骨头缺血性坏死,均在三角肌胸大肌间沟入路组。

结论

我们发现,在肱骨近端骨折的手术治疗中,三角肌胸大肌间沟入路与三角肌劈开入路在临床、影像学及电生理结果方面无统计学显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验