Focus on quality, not just quantity.
作者信息
Peng Changhui
机构信息
College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
出版信息
Nature. 2011 Jul 20;475(7356):267. doi: 10.1038/475267a.
DOI:10.1038/475267a
PMID:21776039
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Focus on quality, not just quantity.
Nature. 2011 Jul 20;475(7356):267. doi: 10.1038/475267a.
2
International Network for the Availability of Scientific Publications: facilitating scientific publishing in developing countries.
PLoS Biol. 2004 Nov;2(11):e326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020326. Epub 2004 Nov 16.
3
[Degree of coverage of Danish health sciences research in the Science Citation Index, 1998].
Ugeskr Laeger. 2004 Sep 27;166(40):3493-7.
4
Bibliometric analysis of nicotine research in China during the period of 1991 to 2007.
Inhal Toxicol. 2009 Sep;21(11):965-71. doi: 10.1080/08958370802590507.
5
[Bibliometric indicators in evaluation of research activity. 1. Publishing and evaluation of research].
Lijec Vjesn. 2001 Mar-Apr;123(3-4):77-81.
6
Scientific publishing. U.S. output flattens, and NSF wonders why.
Science. 2007 Aug 3;317(5838):582. doi: 10.1126/science.317.5838.582.
7
Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
Nature. 2005 Jul 7;436(7047):24. doi: 10.1038/436024d.
8
The impact factor: a misleading and flawed measure of research quality.
J Sports Sci. 2005 Jan;23(1):1-3. doi: 10.1080/02640410400014208.
9
East & Southeast Asia.
Nature. 2014 Nov 13;515(7526):S73-5. doi: 10.1038/515S73a.
10
Plagiarism and misconduct in scientific publishing.
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2009 May;61(5):539. doi: 10.1211/jpp/61.05.0001.
引用本文的文献
1
China's Research Evaluation Reform: What are the Consequences for Global Science?
Minerva. 2022;60(3):329-347. doi: 10.1007/s11024-022-09468-7. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
2
Rule on papers puts China's PhDs at risk.
Nature. 2011 Aug 10;476(7359):152. doi: 10.1038/476152b.
Zotero 插件