Exponent, 1010 14th Street, San Francisco, CA 94114, USA.
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 May;19(3):727-33. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2004.12.030.
The recent emphasis on children's health has led to new requirements in developmental neurotoxicity testing and evolving new approaches to children's risk assessment. As more regulatory DNT studies are being submitted and used for children's risk assessment, appropriate data interpretation of developmental neurotoxicity studies is an important step to improving the scientific basis for children's risk assessments. Preweaning motor activity testing is used to illustrate the types of issues important to appropriate data analysis and evaluation. The EPA guidelines require that motor activity be tested at PND 13, 17, 21 and 60. Total activity at each time point and activity levels at each intrasession interval must be reported. Consequently, one common method for analyzing this data is to evaluate total activity levels at each time point or activity level in each intrasession time interval as independent measurements. Review of the scientific literature indicates that data evaluation for motor activity during development should focus primarily on the overall inverted U-shaped pattern of total activity over PND 13, 17 and 21 and secondarily on the development of intrasession response decrement. The interpretation of the data for risk assessment purposes needs to be guided by our understanding of the strengths and limitations of our knowledge of the biologic basis for these tests.
近年来对儿童健康的重视,导致了发育神经毒性测试的新要求和儿童风险评估方法的不断发展。随着越来越多的监管性发育神经毒性研究被提交并用于儿童风险评估,对发育神经毒性研究进行适当的数据解释是提高儿童风险评估科学基础的重要步骤。新生动物运动活动测试用于说明适当数据分析和评估的重要问题类型。EPA 指南要求在 PND 13、17、21 和 60 时测试运动活动。每个时间点的总活动和每个室内间隔的活动水平必须报告。因此,一种常见的分析此数据的方法是将每个时间点的总活动水平或每个室内间隔的活动水平作为独立的测量值进行评估。对发育中运动活动数据的科学文献回顾表明,对于发育中的运动活动数据的评估应主要集中在 PND 13、17 和 21 期间总活动的整体倒 U 型模式上,其次是室内反应递减的发展。为了风险评估目的对数据的解释需要以我们对这些测试的生物学基础的了解的优缺点为指导。