Suppr超能文献

一项从亮丙瑞林到地加瑞克的 1 臂交叉的 III 期扩展试验:促性腺激素释放激素激动剂和拮抗剂对前列腺癌作用的比较。

A phase III extension trial with a 1-arm crossover from leuprolide to degarelix: comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and antagonist effect on prostate cancer.

机构信息

Urologic Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2011 Sep;186(3):889-97. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.083. Epub 2011 Jul 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We investigated the efficacy and safety of degarelix treatment and the effects of switching from leuprolide to degarelix in an ongoing extension study with a median 27.5-month followup of a pivotal 1-year prostate cancer trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who completed a 1-year pivotal phase III trial continued on the same monthly degarelix maintenance dose (160 or 80 mg in 125 each), or were re-randomized from leuprolide 7.5 mg to degarelix 240/80 mg (69) or 240/160 mg (65). Data are shown on the approved degarelix 240/80 mg dose. The primary end point was safety/tolerability and the secondary end points were testosterone, prostate specific antigen, luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone responses, and prostate specific antigen failure and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

During followup testosterone and prostate specific antigen suppression were similar to those in the 1-year trial in patients who continued on degarelix or switched from leuprolide. The prostate specific antigen progression-free survival hazard rate was decreased significantly after the switch in the leuprolide/degarelix group while the rate in those who continued on degarelix was consistent with the rate in treatment year 1. The same hazard rate change pattern occurred in the group with baseline prostate specific antigen greater than 20 ng/ml. Adverse event frequency was similar between the groups and decreased with time.

CONCLUSIONS

Data support the statistically significant prostate specific antigen progression-free survival benefit for degarelix over leuprolide seen during year 1 and the use of degarelix as first line androgen deprivation therapy as an alternative to a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist.

摘要

目的

我们调查了在一项关键的 1 年前列腺癌试验的持续扩展研究中,使用 Degarelix 治疗的疗效和安全性,以及从亮丙瑞林转换为 Degarelix 的效果。该研究的中位随访时间为 27.5 个月。

材料和方法

完成 1 年关键 III 期试验的患者继续使用相同的每月 Degarelix 维持剂量(125 名患者中各有 160 或 80 毫克),或从亮丙瑞林 7.5 毫克重新随机分配至 Degarelix 240/80 毫克(69 名患者)或 240/160 毫克(65 名患者)。数据显示在批准的 Degarelix 240/80 毫克剂量上。主要终点是安全性/耐受性,次要终点是睾酮、前列腺特异性抗原、促黄体生成素和卵泡刺激素反应以及前列腺特异性抗原失败和无进展生存期。

结果

在随访期间,继续使用 Degarelix 或从亮丙瑞林转换的患者的睾酮和前列腺特异性抗原抑制与 1 年试验中的相似。亮丙瑞林/ Degarelix 组的前列腺特异性抗原无进展生存期危险率在转换后显著降低,而继续使用 Degarelix 的患者的危险率与治疗第 1 年的危险率一致。在基线前列腺特异性抗原大于 20 ng/ml 的患者中,也出现了相同的危险率变化模式。两组的不良事件频率相似,且随时间减少。

结论

数据支持在第 1 年期间 Degarelix 相对于亮丙瑞林的前列腺特异性抗原无进展生存期的统计学显著获益,以及将 Degarelix 用作 GnRH 激动剂的替代方案作为一线雄激素剥夺治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验