M.S. Kaohsiung Municipal Chinese Medical Hospital, Taiwan.
Health Soc Care Community. 2012 Jan;20(1):80-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01019.x. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
A considerable proportion of Taiwanese people believe that Chinese medicine is superior for treating the cause of disease (curative therapy) whereas western medicine is mostly concerned with treating symptoms (symptomatic therapy). As a result, when illness arises, the combined use of both Chinese and western medicine is a common practice and referred to as pluralistic health-seeking behaviour. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to explore the relationship between beliefs of superiority of western or Chinese medicine, utilisation of therapy and glycaemic control in patients with diabetes from outpatient departments. The study was conducted between 20 December 2005 and 20 January 2006. We approached 176 patients consecutively, and 151 (85.8%) completed the survey. Seventy-nine patients with diabetes from a municipal Chinese medicine hospital and 72 patients from a near by western medicine hospital in southern Taiwan were recruited. Participants were asked to fill in a structured questionnaire. For those who could not fill in the questionnaire, interviews were conducted. Sixty-four participants took western medicine (42.4%), 65 people (43.0%) used the combination of western and Chinese medicine and 22 (14.6%) used Chinese medicine only. Beliefs about the superiority of Chinese versus western medicine were associated with the patients' utilisation of those therapies. Patients using a combination of Chinese and western medicine had significantly better glycaemic control than patients using Chinese medicine alone. Further research is needed to clarify whether better glycaemic control was the result of the combined therapy, a higher motivation for self-care or both. Nevertheless, a combination of traditional and western medicine plays an important role and should not be ignored in controlling diabetes. However, the cost-effectiveness of such a plural therapy needs to be investigated.
相当一部分台湾民众认为中药在治病(治本疗法)方面优于西药,而西药主要关注症状(对症疗法)。因此,当疾病发生时,中西医结合是一种常见的做法,被称为多元化的寻医行为。本横断面研究旨在探讨门诊糖尿病患者对中西医学优越性的信念、治疗利用与血糖控制之间的关系。该研究于 2005 年 12 月 20 日至 2006 年 1 月 20 日进行。我们连续接触了 176 名患者,其中 151 名(85.8%)完成了调查。研究招募了来自台湾南部一家市立中医院的 79 名糖尿病患者和附近一家西医院的 72 名糖尿病患者。参与者被要求填写一份结构式问卷。对于那些无法填写问卷的人,我们进行了访谈。64 名参与者服用西药(42.4%),65 人(43.0%)同时使用中西药,22 人(14.6%)仅服用中药。对中西医学优越性的信念与患者对这些疗法的利用有关。同时使用中西药的患者血糖控制明显优于仅使用中药的患者。需要进一步的研究来澄清更好的血糖控制是联合治疗的结果、自我护理的更高动机还是两者兼而有之。尽管如此,传统医学与西方医学的结合在控制糖尿病方面发挥着重要作用,不容忽视。然而,这种多元化治疗的成本效益需要进行调查。