Department of Psychology, University of Aarhus, Jens Chr Skous vej 4, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Hum Reprod. 2011 Oct;26(10):2763-76. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der246. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
A number of studies have investigated the relationship between psychological factors such as stress and distress (measured as anxiety and depression) and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART). The results, however, are inconsistent, and the strength of any associations remains to be clarified. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the results of studies reporting on the associations between stress, anxiety, and depression and ART outcomes.
Prospective studies reporting data on associations between stress or distress in female patients and ART outcome were identified and evaluated by two independent researchers according to an a priori developed codebook. Authors were contacted in cases of insufficient data reporting. Stress was defined as perceived stress, work-related stress, minor life events or major life events, and distress was defined as anxiety or depression.
A total of 31 prospective studies were included. Small, statistically significant, pooled effect sizes were found for stress [ESr, effect size correlation) = -0.08; P = 0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.15, -0.01], trait anxiety (ESr = -0.14; P = 0.02, 95% CI: -0.25, -0.03) and state anxiety (ESr = -0.10, P = 0.03, 95% CI: -0.19, -0.01), indicating negative associations with clinical pregnancy rates. A non-significant trend (Esr = -0.11, P = 0.06) was found for an association between depression and clinical pregnancy. For serum pregnancy tests and live birth rates, associations between trait anxiety or state anxiety were not significant. The fail safe number did not exceed the suggested criterion in any analyses, between-study heterogeneity was considerable and the mean age, mean duration of infertility and percentage of first time ART attenders in the study samples were found to moderate several of the associations.
Small but significant associations were found between stress and distress and reduced pregnancy chances with ART. However, there were a limited number of studies and considerable between-study heterogeneity. Taken together, the influence of stress and distress on ART outcome may appear somewhat limited.
多项研究调查了心理因素(如压力和困扰,以焦虑和抑郁来衡量)与辅助生殖技术(ART)结果之间的关系。然而,结果不一致,任何关联的强度仍有待澄清。我们对报告压力、焦虑和抑郁与 ART 结果之间关联的研究结果进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。
根据预先制定的编码簿,由两名独立研究人员确定并评估了报告女性患者压力或困扰与 ART 结果之间关联的前瞻性研究。在数据报告不足的情况下,会联系作者。压力定义为感知压力、与工作相关的压力、小的生活事件或大的生活事件,困扰定义为焦虑或抑郁。
共纳入 31 项前瞻性研究。发现压力[ESr(效应量相关)=-0.08;P=0.02,95%置信区间(CI):-0.15,-0.01]、特质焦虑(ESr=-0.14;P=0.02,95%CI:-0.25,-0.03)和状态焦虑(ESr=-0.10,P=0.03,95%CI:-0.19,-0.01)与临床妊娠率呈负相关,且具有统计学意义的小效应量。抑郁与临床妊娠的相关性呈非显著趋势(ESr=-0.11,P=0.06)。在任何分析中,特质焦虑或状态焦虑与血清妊娠试验和活产率之间的关联均不显著。失效安全数在任何分析中均未超过建议的标准,研究间异质性很大,研究样本中的平均年龄、不孕持续时间和首次接受 ART 治疗的百分比被认为是几种关联的调节因素。
压力和困扰与 ART 妊娠机会减少之间存在较小但有统计学意义的关联。然而,研究数量有限,研究间异质性很大。综合来看,压力和困扰对 ART 结果的影响可能略显有限。