Suppr超能文献

用于免疫沉淀的抗体交联和靶标洗脱方案会显著调节下游 2D-PAGE 分析中的信号与噪声比。

Antibody cross-linking and target elution protocols used for immunoprecipitation significantly modulate signal-to noise ratio in downstream 2D-PAGE analysis.

机构信息

Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and The FUGE proteomics laboratory, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7006 Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Proteome Sci. 2011 Aug 4;9:45. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-9-45.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immunoprecipitation and subsequent 2D-PAGE/mass spectrometry are powerful tools to study post-translational protein modifications. Often disregarded in this workflow is the impact of the chemical cross-linker upon antibody affinity, as well as incomplete elution of primary target protein in buffers commonly used in 2D-PAGE. This may impede detection of non-abundant protein isoforms.

RESULTS

Here we have compared cross-linking of antibodies to Dynabeads® Protein A by using DMP or BS3, as well as the efficiency of various target elution buffers prior to 2D-PAGE separation. BS3 cross-linking generally resulted in less non-specific binding than DMP, whereas DMP cross-linking gave overall higher yield of target protein. Regardless of the cross-linker used, incomplete elution of target protein was observed with conventional glycine- or urea-based buffers. Conversely, complete elution was obtained with 2% hot SDS and subsequent dilution in urea buffer containing 4% CHAPS, to 0.2% final SDS yielded perfectly focused gels suitable for mass spectrometry analysis.

CONCLUSION

Careful choice of Ig cross-linker as well as efficient elution of target protein in SDS prior to downstream 2D-PAGE may be key factors to analyze low-abundance proteins enriched by magnetic bead immunoprecipitation.

摘要

背景

免疫沉淀和随后的 2D-PAGE/质谱分析是研究翻译后蛋白质修饰的强大工具。在这个工作流程中,经常被忽视的是化学交联剂对抗体亲和力的影响,以及在 2D-PAGE 中常用的缓冲液中主要目标蛋白的不完全洗脱。这可能会阻碍对非丰富蛋白质同工型的检测。

结果

在这里,我们比较了使用 DMP 或 BS3 交联抗体到 Dynabeads® Protein A 的情况,以及在进行 2D-PAGE 分离之前各种目标洗脱缓冲液的效率。BS3 交联通常比 DMP 产生更少的非特异性结合,而 DMP 交联则产生更高的目标蛋白总体产量。无论使用哪种交联剂,都观察到用传统的甘氨酸或尿素基缓冲液不完全洗脱目标蛋白。相反,用 2%的热 SDS 洗脱,并随后在含有 4% CHAPS 的尿素缓冲液中稀释,最终 SDS 浓度为 0.2%,可得到完全聚焦的凝胶,适合用于质谱分析。

结论

仔细选择 Ig 交联剂以及在 SDS 中有效洗脱目标蛋白,然后再进行下游的 2D-PAGE,可能是通过磁珠免疫沉淀富集低丰度蛋白质进行分析的关键因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验