Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022518. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
In previous studies of interference in vibrotactile working memory, subjects were presented with an interfering distractor stimulus during the delay period between the target and probe stimuli in a delayed match-to-sample task. The accuracy of same/different decisions indicated feature overwriting was the mechanism of interference. However, the distractor was presented late in the delay period, and the distractor may have interfered with the decision-making process, rather than the maintenance of stored information. The present study varies the timing of distractor onset, (either early, in the middle, or late in the delay period), and demonstrates both overwriting and non-overwriting forms of interference.
在先前关于振动触觉工作记忆干扰的研究中,在延迟匹配样本任务中,目标刺激和探测刺激之间的延迟期间,向被试呈现干扰性分心刺激。相同/不同决策的准确性表明特征覆盖是干扰的机制。然而,分心刺激是在延迟期间的后期呈现的,并且分心刺激可能干扰了决策过程,而不是存储信息的维持。本研究改变了分心刺激的起始时间(早期、中期或延迟期间的后期),并证明了覆盖和非覆盖两种形式的干扰。