Department of Emergency Medicine, Jesse Brown VA Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;58(5):482-9.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
We empirically identify those aspects that make an effective lecture according to both quantitative and qualitative assessments of the opinions of a select group of emergency medicine educators.
The authors worked collaboratively with the Educational Meetings Committee of the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) to distribute surveys to 150 participants identified as exemplary lecturers in emergency medicine. These participants had been rated in the top 10% of all lecturers by ACEP's Educational Meetings Committee, according to audience evaluations. Respondents quantitatively rated the importance of a set of strategies for the design/organization and delivery of a lecture. Additional qualitative responses were elicited from semistructured, open-ended questions that were used to identify conceptual themes and subcategories of major themes.
One hundred fifty surveys were sent. Seventy-four (49%) of the surveys were returned, of which 67 (45%) were analyzed. Quantitative results revealed the top 3 categories of importance about design/organization (having a manageable scope of content for the allotted time, having clear objectives, and using case-based scenarios) and the top 3 categories of importance about delivery (knowledge of slides/material, having passion/enthusiasm, and interaction with the audience). Qualitative results revealed 5 thematic concepts from the analysis of 281 statements: delivery, vehicle, content, preparation, and uncontrollables, in order of descending importance according to our results. Under the category "delivery," the subcategory "engaging" was the most frequently endorsed quality. "Relevance," under the category "content," was the second most endorsed quality of all the statements obtained.
Quantitative and qualitative findings indicate that a specific and directed structure, a lecturer's knowledge base, and confidence and enthusiasm for the material are key components in the development of an effective lecture. These self-reported findings help describe strategies of exemplary emergency medicine lecturers that can be considered by faculty, residents, and other presenters.
我们根据一组精选的急诊医学教育者的定量和定性评估意见,实证确定了使讲座有效的各个方面。
作者与美国急诊医师学院(ACEP)教育会议委员会合作,向 150 名被确定为急诊医学示范讲师的参与者分发了调查问卷。这些参与者根据观众评估,被 ACEP 教育会议委员会评为所有讲师中排名前 10%的讲师。受访者对一套设计/组织和讲授讲座的策略的重要性进行了定量评估。从半结构化的开放式问题中引出了额外的定性回复,用于确定概念主题和主要主题的子类别。
共发送了 150 份调查问卷。收回了 74 份(49%)调查问卷,其中 67 份(45%)进行了分析。定量结果显示,在设计/组织方面最重要的前 3 个类别(在规定时间内拥有可管理的内容范围、有明确的目标以及使用基于案例的场景)和在讲授方面最重要的前 3 个类别(幻灯片/材料知识、充满激情/热情以及与观众互动)。定性结果从对 281 条陈述的分析中揭示了 5 个主题概念:讲授、媒介、内容、准备和不可控因素,根据我们的结果,按重要性降序排列。在“讲授”类别下,“引人入胜”是最常被认可的质量。在“内容”类别下,“相关性”是所有获得陈述中第二受认可的质量。
定量和定性结果表明,具体而有针对性的结构、讲师的知识库以及对材料的信心和热情是开发有效讲座的关键组成部分。这些自我报告的发现有助于描述模范急诊医学讲师的策略,这些策略可以被教师、住院医师和其他演讲者考虑。