Stachel Thomas, Harris Jeff W
The University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E3, Canada.
J Phys Condens Matter. 2009 Sep 9;21(36):364206. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/36/364206. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
The principal sources of natural diamonds are peridotitic (about 2/3 of diamonds) and eclogitic (1/3) domains located at 140-200 km depth in the subcratonic lithospheric mantle. There, diamonds probably form during redox reactions in the presence of melt (likely for eclogitic and lherzolitic diamonds) or under subsolidus conditions in the presence of CHO fluids (likely for harzburgitic diamonds). Co-variations of δ(13)C and the nitrogen content of diamonds suggest that two modes of formation may have been operational in peridotitic sources: (1) reduction of carbonates, that during closed system fractionation drives diamond compositions to higher δ(13)C values and lower nitrogen concentrations and (2) oxidation of methane, that in a closed system leads to a trend of decreasing δ(13)C with decreasing nitrogen. The present day redox state of subcratonic lithospheric mantle is generally too reduced to allow for methane oxidation to be a widespread process. Therefore, reduction of carbonate dissolved in melts and fluids is likely the dominant mode of diamond formation for the Phanerozoic (545 Ma-present) and Proterozoic (2.5 Ga-545 Ma). Model calculations indicate, however, that for predominantly Paleoarchean (3.6-3.2 Ga) to Mesoarchean (3.2-2.8 Ga) harzburgitic diamonds, methane reduction is the principal mode of precipitation. This suggests that the reduced present day character (oxygen fugacity below carbonate stability) of peridotitic diamond sources may be a secondary feature, possibly acquired during reducing Archean (>2.5 Ga) metasomatism. Recycling of biogenic carbonates back into the mantle through subduction only became an important process in the Paleoproterozoic (2.5-1.6 Ga) and diamonds forming during carbonate reduction, therefore, may predominantly be post-Archean in age. For eclogitic diamonds, open system fractionation processes involving separation of a CO(2) fluid appear to dominate, but in principal the same two modes of formation (methane oxidation, carbonate reduction) may have operated. Direct conversion of graphitized subducted organic matter is not considered to be an important process for the formation of eclogitic diamonds. The possible derivation of (12)C enriched carbon in eclogitic diamonds from remobilized former organic matter is, however, feasible in some cases and seems likely involved, for example, in the formation of sublithospheric eclogitic diamonds from the former Jagersfontein Mine (South Africa).
天然钻石的主要来源是位于克拉通下岩石圈地幔140 - 200千米深处的橄榄岩质区域(约占钻石的2/3)和榴辉岩质区域(1/3)。在那里,钻石可能在熔体存在的情况下通过氧化还原反应形成(榴辉岩质和二辉橄榄岩质钻石可能如此),或者在含有CHO流体的亚固相条件下形成(方辉橄榄岩质钻石可能如此)。钻石的δ(13)C值与氮含量的协变表明,在橄榄岩质源区可能存在两种形成模式:(1)碳酸盐的还原,在封闭系统分馏过程中,这会使钻石成分的δ(13)C值升高、氮浓度降低;(2)甲烷的氧化,在封闭系统中,这会导致δ(13)C值随氮含量降低而降低的趋势。克拉通下岩石圈地幔目前的氧化还原状态总体上过于还原,以至于甲烷氧化难以成为一个广泛存在的过程。因此,溶解在熔体和流体中的碳酸盐的还原可能是显生宙(5.45亿年前至今)和元古宙(25亿 - 5.45亿年前)钻石形成的主要模式。然而,模型计算表明,对于主要为古太古代(36亿 - 32亿年前)到中太古代(32亿 - 28亿年前)的方辉橄榄岩质钻石,甲烷还原是沉淀的主要模式。这表明橄榄岩质钻石源区目前还原的特征(氧逸度低于碳酸盐稳定性)可能是一个次生特征,可能是在太古代(>25亿年前)的还原交代作用期间获得的。通过俯冲将生物成因的碳酸盐重新循环回地幔,直到古元古代(25亿 - 16亿年前)才成为一个重要过程,因此,在碳酸盐还原过程中形成的钻石,其年龄可能主要是太古代之后的。对于榴辉岩质钻石,涉及CO₂流体分离的开放系统分馏过程似乎占主导,但原则上同样的两种形成模式(甲烷氧化、碳酸盐还原)可能也起作用。石墨化的俯冲有机质的直接转化不被认为是榴辉岩质钻石形成的一个重要过程。然而,在某些情况下,榴辉岩质钻石中富含¹²C的碳可能源自重新活化的先前有机质,这似乎可能参与其中,例如,在南非前贾格斯方丹矿形成的岩石圈下榴辉岩质钻石的过程中。