Suppr超能文献

来那度胺治疗新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者的阿司匹林或依诺肝素预防血栓

Aspirin or enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide.

机构信息

Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria (AOU) S. Giovanni Battista, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Blood. 2012 Jan 26;119(4):933-9; quiz 1093. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-03-344333. Epub 2011 Aug 11.

Abstract

Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is effective in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) but is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This prospective, open-label, randomized substudy of a phase 3 trial compared the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis with low-dose aspirin (ASA) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with newly diagnosed MM, treated with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone induction and melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide consolidation. Overall, 342 patients who did not have clinical indications or contraindications to antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy were randomly assigned to receive ASA 100 mg/d (n = 176) or LMWH enoxaparin 40 mg/d (n = 166). The incidence of VTE was 2.27% in the ASA group and 1.20% in the LMWH group. Compared with LMWH, the absolute difference in the proportion of VTE was 1.07% (95% confidence interval, -1.69-3.83; P = .452) in the ASA group. Pulmonary embolism was observed in 1.70% of patients in the ASA group and none in the LMWH group. No arterial thrombosis, acute cardiovascular events, or sudden deaths were reported. No major hemorrhagic complications were reported. In previously untreated patients with MM receiving lenalidomide with a low thromboembolic risk, ASA could be an effective and less-expensive alternative to LMWH thromboprophylaxis.

摘要

来那度胺联合地塞米松治疗多发性骨髓瘤(MM)有效,但与静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险增加相关。这项前瞻性、开放标签、随机亚研究是一项 3 期试验的一部分,比较了低剂量阿司匹林(ASA)或低分子肝素(LMWH)用于新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者的疗效和安全性,这些患者接受来那度胺和低剂量地塞米松诱导以及马法兰-泼尼松-来那度胺巩固治疗。共有 342 名无抗血小板或抗凝治疗临床指征或禁忌证的患者被随机分配接受 ASA 100 mg/d(n = 176)或 LMWH 依诺肝素 40 mg/d(n = 166)。ASA 组的 VTE 发生率为 2.27%,LMWH 组为 1.20%。与 LMWH 相比,ASA 组 VTE 发生率的绝对差异为 1.07%(95%置信区间,-1.69-3.83;P =.452)。ASA 组有 1.70%的患者发生肺栓塞,LMWH 组无患者发生。未报告动脉血栓形成、急性心血管事件或猝死。未报告重大出血并发症。在接受来那度胺治疗且血栓栓塞风险较低的初治 MM 患者中,ASA 可能是 LMWH 预防性抗凝的有效且更经济的替代方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验