Curtin François, Schulz Pierre
GeNeuro SA, Plan les Ouates, Switzerland.
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011;13(2):183-90. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2011.13.2/fcurtin.
Randomized evidence from clinical trials and naturalistic evidence collected from pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacovigilance activities both contribute to the initial and continuous assessment of the benefits and risks of a drug, ie, the balance between therapeutic efficacy and safety risks. Benefit-risk assessment (BRA) mainly relies on a qualitative assessment of quantitative data. Current attempts to quantify BRA are reviewed and discussed, along with the expectations of regulatory authorities such as the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. No method provides a fully satisfactory solution regarding BRA, because it is difficult to reduce its multidimensional aspect to simple metrics, in a context where other therapeutic alternatives play a role. Consistency and transparency are key in this assessment, which is performed throughout the whole drug life cycle. BRA is mainly based on randomized clinical studies during clinical development, and it is continued and consolidated by naturalistic data once the drug is on the market.
来自临床试验的随机证据以及从药物流行病学和药物警戒活动中收集的自然主义证据,都有助于对药物的益处和风险进行初始和持续评估,即治疗效果与安全风险之间的平衡。获益-风险评估(BRA)主要依赖于对定量数据的定性评估。本文回顾并讨论了当前量化BRA的尝试,以及美国食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局等监管机构的期望。没有一种方法能为BRA提供完全令人满意的解决方案,因为在存在其他治疗选择的情况下,很难将其多维度的方面简化为简单的指标。在整个药物生命周期中进行的这项评估中,一致性和透明度是关键。BRA在临床开发期间主要基于随机临床研究,一旦药物上市,便通过自然主义数据继续并巩固该评估。