Suppr超能文献

肾脏肿瘤的肾肿瘤评分是否能预测选择机器人辅助部分肾切除术患者的结局?

Does nephrometry scoring of renal tumors predict outcomes in patients selected for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy?

机构信息

Department of Urology, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27104, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2011 Oct;25(10):1649-53. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0003. Epub 2011 Aug 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy has emerged as a viable surgical treatment for patients with certain renal tumors. We hypothesized that extirpation of more complex tumors, as graded with the nephrometry score, would result in worse operative and postoperative outcomes when compared with tumors with lower nephrometry scores. We report whether nephrometry-graded tumor complexity impacted operative or postoperative outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single experienced surgeon at our tertiary-care institution performed more than 100 robot-assisted partial nephrectomies. Istitutional Review Board-approved data collection was available for 95 patients, and nephrometry scores were available for 92 patients. Cases were divided into tertiles, based on their nephrometry score of low, medium, or high. We compared preoperative, operative, and postoperative data to evaluate any differences between the three tertiles. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP 8 software.

RESULTS

There were 66, 22, and 4 patients in the low, medium, and high nephrometry score tertiles, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the tertiles regarding warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, operative time, length of stay, change in glomerular filtration rate, Clavien-graded complication rates, or any other metric. Mean follow-up for each tertile was also similar.

CONCLUSIONS

We have routinely been using the nephrometry scoring system to anatomically describe renal masses before robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Our findings demonstrate that nephrometry-graded tumor complexity was not related to any differences in outcomes for patients with renal tumors who were selected at our institution to undergo robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. The nephrometry system remains a reproducible standardized classification of renal tumor anatomy, but it remains to be seen if this can be used to predict surgical outcomes.

摘要

背景与目的

机器人辅助部分肾切除术已成为某些肾肿瘤患者的可行手术治疗方法。我们假设,与肾肿瘤评分较低的肿瘤相比,评分较高的肿瘤(根据肾肿瘤评分系统分级)在手术和术后结果方面会更差。我们报告肾肿瘤评分分级的肿瘤复杂性是否会影响手术或术后结果。

患者和方法

我们的三级保健机构的一位经验丰富的外科医生进行了 100 多例机器人辅助部分肾切除术。机构审查委员会批准了 95 例患者的数据采集,92 例患者有肾肿瘤评分。根据肾肿瘤评分的低、中、高,将病例分为三分位。我们比较了术前、术中、术后数据,以评估三个三分位之间的任何差异。使用 JMP 8 软件进行统计分析。

结果

低、中、高肾肿瘤评分三分位数组分别有 66、22 和 4 例患者。三组之间在热缺血时间、估计失血量、手术时间、住院时间、肾小球滤过率变化、Clavien 分级并发症发生率或任何其他指标方面均无统计学差异。每个三分位数的平均随访时间也相似。

结论

我们一直在使用肾肿瘤评分系统对机器人辅助部分肾切除术前的肾脏肿块进行解剖描述。我们的发现表明,肾肿瘤评分分级的肿瘤复杂性与在我们机构选择接受机器人辅助部分肾切除术的肾肿瘤患者的结果没有任何差异。肾肿瘤评分系统仍然是一种可重复的标准化肾肿瘤解剖分类,但尚需观察其是否可用于预测手术结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验