Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA.
PM R. 2011 Dec;3(12):1092-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.04.022.
To investigate the influence of performance feedback and motivation during 2 tests of simple visuomotor reaction time (RT).
Cross-sectional, observational study.
Outpatient academic physiatry clinic.
Thirty-one healthy adults (mean [SD], 54 ± 15 years).
Participants completed a clinical test of RT (RT(clin)) and a computerized test of RT with and without performance feedback (RT(compFB) and RT(compNoFB), respectively) in randomly assigned order. They then ranked their degree of motivation during each test. RT(clin) measured the time required to catch a suspended vertical shaft by hand closure after release of the shaft by the examiner. RT(compFB) and RT(compNoFB) both measured the time required to press a computer key in response to a visual cue displayed on a computer monitor. Performance feedback (visual display of the previous trial and summary results) was provided for RT(compFB), but not for RT(compNoFB).
Means and standard deviations of RT(clin), RT(compFB), and RT(compNoFB) and participants' self-reported motivation on a 5-point Likert scale for each test.
There were significant differences in both the means and standard deviations of RT(clin), RT(compFB), and RT(compNoFB) (F(2,60) = 81.66, P < .0001; F(2,60) = 32.46, P < .0001, respectively), with RT(clin) being both the fastest and least variable of the RT measurements. RT(clin) was more strongly correlated with RT(compFB) (r = 0.449, P = .0011) than with RT(compNoFB) (r = 0.314, P = .086). The participants reported similar levels of motivation between RT(clin) and RT(compFB), both of which were reported to be more motivating than RT(compNoFB).
The stronger correlation between RT(clin) and RT(compFB) as well as the higher reported motivation during RT(clin) and RT(compFB) testing suggest that performance feedback is a positive motivating factor that is inherent to RT(clin) testing. RT(clin) is a simple, inexpensive technique for measuring RT and appears to be an intrinsically motivating task. This motivation may promote faster, more consistent RT performance compared with currently available computerized programs, which do not typically provide performance feedback.
探讨 2 项简单视运动反应时(RT)测试中绩效反馈和动机对其的影响。
横断面、观察性研究。
门诊学术理疗诊所。
31 名健康成年人(平均[标准差],54±15 岁)。
参与者以随机顺序分别完成临床 RT 测试(RT(clin))和具有/不具有绩效反馈的计算机 RT 测试(RT(compFB)和 RT(compNoFB))。然后,他们对每项测试的动机程度进行了评分。RT(clin)通过在检查者释放垂直轴后手动闭合来测量捕获悬垂轴所需的时间。RT(compFB)和 RT(compNoFB)均通过响应计算机显示器上显示的视觉提示按下计算机键来测量时间。为 RT(compFB)提供了绩效反馈(上一次试验的视觉显示和总结结果),但 RT(compNoFB)没有。
RT(clin)、RT(compFB)和 RT(compNoFB)的均值和标准差,以及参与者在 5 分制李克特量表上对每项测试的自我报告动机。
RT(clin)、RT(compFB)和 RT(compNoFB)的均值和标准差均存在显著差异(F(2,60) = 81.66,P<.0001;F(2,60) = 32.46,P<.0001),其中 RT(clin)是 RT 测量中最快且最稳定的。RT(clin)与 RT(compFB)的相关性更强(r = 0.449,P =.0011),而与 RT(compNoFB)的相关性较弱(r = 0.314,P =.086)。参与者报告 RT(clin)和 RT(compFB)之间的动机水平相似,两者的动机均强于 RT(compNoFB)。
RT(clin)与 RT(compFB)之间的相关性更强,以及 RT(clin)和 RT(compFB)测试中报告的更高动机表明,绩效反馈是 RT(clin)测试固有的积极激励因素。RT(clin)是一种简单、经济的 RT 测量技术,似乎是一项内在激励任务。与目前通常不提供绩效反馈的计算机化程序相比,这种动机可能会促进更快、更一致的 RT 表现。