Suppr超能文献

探讨反馈和激励在临床反应时间评估中的作用。

Investigating the role of feedback and motivation in clinical reaction time assessment.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA.

出版信息

PM R. 2011 Dec;3(12):1092-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.04.022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of performance feedback and motivation during 2 tests of simple visuomotor reaction time (RT).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, observational study.

SETTING

Outpatient academic physiatry clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-one healthy adults (mean [SD], 54 ± 15 years).

METHODS

Participants completed a clinical test of RT (RT(clin)) and a computerized test of RT with and without performance feedback (RT(compFB) and RT(compNoFB), respectively) in randomly assigned order. They then ranked their degree of motivation during each test. RT(clin) measured the time required to catch a suspended vertical shaft by hand closure after release of the shaft by the examiner. RT(compFB) and RT(compNoFB) both measured the time required to press a computer key in response to a visual cue displayed on a computer monitor. Performance feedback (visual display of the previous trial and summary results) was provided for RT(compFB), but not for RT(compNoFB).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Means and standard deviations of RT(clin), RT(compFB), and RT(compNoFB) and participants' self-reported motivation on a 5-point Likert scale for each test.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in both the means and standard deviations of RT(clin), RT(compFB), and RT(compNoFB) (F(2,60) = 81.66, P < .0001; F(2,60) = 32.46, P < .0001, respectively), with RT(clin) being both the fastest and least variable of the RT measurements. RT(clin) was more strongly correlated with RT(compFB) (r = 0.449, P = .0011) than with RT(compNoFB) (r = 0.314, P = .086). The participants reported similar levels of motivation between RT(clin) and RT(compFB), both of which were reported to be more motivating than RT(compNoFB).

CONCLUSIONS

The stronger correlation between RT(clin) and RT(compFB) as well as the higher reported motivation during RT(clin) and RT(compFB) testing suggest that performance feedback is a positive motivating factor that is inherent to RT(clin) testing. RT(clin) is a simple, inexpensive technique for measuring RT and appears to be an intrinsically motivating task. This motivation may promote faster, more consistent RT performance compared with currently available computerized programs, which do not typically provide performance feedback.

摘要

目的

探讨 2 项简单视运动反应时(RT)测试中绩效反馈和动机对其的影响。

设计

横断面、观察性研究。

地点

门诊学术理疗诊所。

参与者

31 名健康成年人(平均[标准差],54±15 岁)。

方法

参与者以随机顺序分别完成临床 RT 测试(RT(clin))和具有/不具有绩效反馈的计算机 RT 测试(RT(compFB)和 RT(compNoFB))。然后,他们对每项测试的动机程度进行了评分。RT(clin)通过在检查者释放垂直轴后手动闭合来测量捕获悬垂轴所需的时间。RT(compFB)和 RT(compNoFB)均通过响应计算机显示器上显示的视觉提示按下计算机键来测量时间。为 RT(compFB)提供了绩效反馈(上一次试验的视觉显示和总结结果),但 RT(compNoFB)没有。

主要观察指标

RT(clin)、RT(compFB)和 RT(compNoFB)的均值和标准差,以及参与者在 5 分制李克特量表上对每项测试的自我报告动机。

结果

RT(clin)、RT(compFB)和 RT(compNoFB)的均值和标准差均存在显著差异(F(2,60) = 81.66,P<.0001;F(2,60) = 32.46,P<.0001),其中 RT(clin)是 RT 测量中最快且最稳定的。RT(clin)与 RT(compFB)的相关性更强(r = 0.449,P =.0011),而与 RT(compNoFB)的相关性较弱(r = 0.314,P =.086)。参与者报告 RT(clin)和 RT(compFB)之间的动机水平相似,两者的动机均强于 RT(compNoFB)。

结论

RT(clin)与 RT(compFB)之间的相关性更强,以及 RT(clin)和 RT(compFB)测试中报告的更高动机表明,绩效反馈是 RT(clin)测试固有的积极激励因素。RT(clin)是一种简单、经济的 RT 测量技术,似乎是一项内在激励任务。与目前通常不提供绩效反馈的计算机化程序相比,这种动机可能会促进更快、更一致的 RT 表现。

相似文献

1
Investigating the role of feedback and motivation in clinical reaction time assessment.
PM R. 2011 Dec;3(12):1092-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.04.022.
4
Can a clinical test of reaction time predict a functional head-protective response?
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Mar;43(3):382-7. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181f1cc51.
5
Evaluating a clinical measure of reaction time: an observational study.
Percept Mot Skills. 2009 Jun;108(3):717-20. doi: 10.2466/PMS.108.3.717-720.
8
OPTIMAL practice conditions enhance the benefits of gradually increasing error opportunities on retention of a stepping sequence task.
Hum Mov Sci. 2017 Dec;56(Pt B):129-138. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
10
RELIABILITY AND CRITERION VALIDITY OF A NOVEL CLINICAL TEST OF SIMPLE AND COMPLEX REACTION TIME IN ATHLETES.
Percept Mot Skills. 2015 Jun;120(3):841-59. doi: 10.2466/25.15.PMS.120v19x6.

引用本文的文献

1
2
Unsupervised, frequent and remote: A novel platform for personalised digital phenotyping of long-term memory in humans.
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 26;18(4):e0284220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284220. eCollection 2023.
3
How Realistic Is Threat Image Projection for X-ray Baggage Screening?
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 13;22(6):2220. doi: 10.3390/s22062220.
6
Clinical Reaction-Time Performance Factors in Healthy Collegiate Athletes.
J Athl Train. 2020 Jun 23;55(6):601-607. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-164-19.
7
Evaluating the Recovery Curve for Clinically Assessed Reaction Time After Concussion.
J Athl Train. 2017 Aug;52(8):766-770. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.6.02. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
8
RELIABILITY AND CRITERION VALIDITY OF A NOVEL CLINICAL TEST OF SIMPLE AND COMPLEX REACTION TIME IN ATHLETES.
Percept Mot Skills. 2015 Jun;120(3):841-59. doi: 10.2466/25.15.PMS.120v19x6.
9
Practice effects associated with repeated assessment of a clinical test of reaction time.
J Athl Train. 2014 May-Jun;49(3):356-9. doi: 10.4085/1062-6059-49.2.04. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
10
Effect of acute exercise on clinically measured reaction time in collegiate athletes.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Mar;46(3):429-34. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000140.

本文引用的文献

3
Can a clinical test of reaction time predict a functional head-protective response?
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Mar;43(3):382-7. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181f1cc51.
5
Evaluating a clinical measure of reaction time: an observational study.
Percept Mot Skills. 2009 Jun;108(3):717-20. doi: 10.2466/PMS.108.3.717-720.
7
A population-based study of sensorimotor factors affecting gait in older people.
Age Ageing. 2009 May;38(3):290-5. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afp017. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
8
A multidomain approach for predicting older driver safety under in-traffic road conditions.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jun;56(6):986-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01709.x. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
9
Physical and psychological factors associated with stair negotiation performance in older people.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Nov;62(11):1259-65. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.11.1259.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验