Perry Rebecca, De Pasquale Carmine G, Chew Derek P, McGavigan Andrew D, Joseph Majo X
Cardiac Services, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Echocardiography. 2011 Oct;28(9):961-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01498.x. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
Mechanical left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, as determined by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, changes in TDI mechanical dyssynchrony after CRT implantation have only limited investigation. Our objective was to detect changes in the extent and location of TDI mechanical dyssynchrony pre- and post-CRT, and to explore their relationship in response to CRT.
Thirty-nine consecutive patients undergoing CRT implantation for chronic heart failure underwent TDI analysis pre-CRT and up to 12 months post-CRT. Regional dyssynchrony was determined by the time to systolic peak velocity of opposing LV walls. Dyssynchrony was defined as a difference in time to peak contraction of >105 msec. Two patients were excluded, as suitable coronary venous access was not available.
Of the 37 patients, 28 (76%) had significant mechanical dyssynchrony pre-CRT. Of those with dyssynchrony, 18 (64%) had septal delay and 10 (36%) had LV free wall delay. Post-CRT, 29 (78%) patients had significant mechanical dyssynchrony, 17 (59%) with septal delay, and 12 (41%) with LV free wall delay. There was no difference in both the amount of dyssynchrony (P=0.8) or the location of the dyssynchrony (P=0.5), before and after CRT, even though 28 (76%) were considered responders based on symptomatic and echocardiographic parameters.
The TDI-derived dyssynchrony does not change with CRT despite significant symptomatic and echocardiographic improvement in cardiac function. The TDI is of limited utility for monitoring response to CRT.
经组织多普勒成像(TDI)测定的机械性左心室(LV)不同步可预测心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的反应。然而,CRT植入后TDI机械不同步的变化仅有有限的研究。我们的目的是检测CRT前后TDI机械不同步的程度和位置变化,并探讨它们与CRT反应的关系。
39例因慢性心力衰竭接受CRT植入的连续患者在CRT前及CRT后长达12个月接受TDI分析。通过左心室相对壁收缩期峰值速度的时间来确定区域不同步。不同步定义为峰值收缩时间差>105毫秒。两名患者因无法获得合适的冠状静脉通路而被排除。
37例患者中,28例(76%)在CRT前有明显的机械不同步。在有不同步的患者中,18例(64%)有间隔延迟,10例(36%)有左心室游离壁延迟。CRT后,29例(78%)患者有明显的机械不同步,17例(59%)有间隔延迟,12例(41%)有左心室游离壁延迟。尽管根据症状和超声心动图参数28例(76%)被认为是反应者,但CRT前后不同步的程度(P=0.8)或不同步的位置(P=0.5)均无差异。
尽管心功能在症状和超声心动图方面有显著改善,但基于TDI的不同步并未随CRT而改变。TDI在监测CRT反应方面的效用有限。