Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, 250 Biological Science Center, 1445 Gortner Ave, St, Paul, MN 55108, USA.
BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Aug 19;11:243. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-243.
The S-RNases of the Solanaceae are highly polymorphic self-incompatibility (S-) alleles subject to strong balancing selection. Relatively recent diversification of S-alleles has occurred in the genus Physalis following a historical restriction of S-allele diversity. In contrast, the genus Solanum did not undergo a restriction of S-locus diversity and its S-alleles are generally much older. Because recovery from reduced S-locus diversity should involve increased selection, we employ a statistical framework to ask whether S-locus selection intensities are higher in Physalis than Solanum. Because different S-RNase lineages diversify in Physalis and Solanum, we also ask whether different sites are under selection in different lineages.
Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian coalescent methods found higher intensities of selection and more sites under significant positive selection in the 48 Physalis S-RNase alleles than the 49 from Solanum. Highest posterior densities of dN/dS (ω) estimates show that the strength of selection is greater for Physalis at 36 codons. A nested maximum likelihood method was more conservative, but still found 16 sites with greater selection in Physalis. Neither method found any codons under significantly greater selection in Solanum. A random effects likelihood method that examines data from both taxa jointly confirmed higher selection intensities in Physalis, but did not find different proportions of sites under selection in the two datasets. The greatest differences in strengths of selection were found in the most variable regions of the S-RNases, as expected if these regions encode self-recognition specificities. Clade-specific likelihood models indicated some codons were under greater selection in background Solanum lineages than in specific lineages of Physalis implying that selection on sites may differ among lineages.
Likelihood and Bayesian methods provide a statistical approach to testing differential selection across populations or species. These tests appear robust to the levels of polymorphism found in diverse S-allele collections subject to strong balancing selection. As predicted, the intensity of selection at the S-locus was higher in the taxon with more recent S-locus diversification. This is the first confirmation by statistical test of differing selection intensities among self-incompatibility alleles from different populations or species.
茄科的 S-RNases 是高度多态的自交不亲和(S-)等位基因,受到强烈的平衡选择。在Physalis 属中,S 等位基因的相对近期多样化是在 S 等位基因多样性的历史限制之后发生的。相比之下,茄属没有经历 S 基因座多样性的限制,其 S 等位基因通常要古老得多。由于从减少的 S 基因座多样性中恢复应该涉及到选择的增加,我们采用统计框架来询问 Physalis 中的 S 基因座选择强度是否高于 Solanum。由于不同的 S-RNase 谱系在 Physalis 和 Solanum 中多样化,我们还询问不同谱系中是否有不同的位点受到选择。
最大似然和贝叶斯合并方法发现,在 48 个 Physalis S-RNase 等位基因中,选择强度更高,有更多的位点受到显著正选择,而在 49 个 Solanum 等位基因中则没有。ω 估计的最高后验密度表明,Physalis 中 36 个密码子的选择强度更大。一种嵌套最大似然方法更为保守,但仍在 Physalis 中发现了 16 个选择强度更大的位点。这两种方法都没有发现 Solanum 中有任何密码子受到更大的选择。一种联合检查两个分类单元数据的随机效应似然方法证实了 Physalis 中的选择强度更高,但没有发现两个数据集的选择位点比例不同。选择强度的最大差异出现在 S-RNases 最具变异性的区域,这与这些区域编码自我识别特异性的预期相符。分支特异性似然模型表明,一些密码子在背景 Solanum 谱系中受到的选择大于 Physalis 特定谱系中的选择,这意味着在不同谱系中,对位点的选择可能不同。
似然和贝叶斯方法为测试种群或物种之间的差异选择提供了一种统计方法。这些测试似乎对受到强烈平衡选择的不同 S 等位基因集合中发现的多态性水平具有稳健性。正如所预测的,在 S 基因座多样化更近的分类群中,S 基因座的选择强度更高。这是首次通过统计检验确认来自不同种群或物种的自交不亲和等位基因的选择强度不同。