Suppr超能文献

高屈曲度与传统全膝关节置换术:一项5年的研究。

High-flexion versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a 5-year study.

作者信息

Endres Stefan

机构信息

Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie Elisabeth-Klinik Bigge/Olsberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2011 Aug;19(2):226-9. doi: 10.1177/230949901101900220.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare mid-term outcomes of a high-flexion prosthesis with a conventional prosthesis.

METHODS

Records of 107 consecutive patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for primary osteoarthritis by a single surgeon were reviewed. 21 men and 36 women (mean age, 65 years) used a high-flexion prosthesis (NexGen CR-Flex Mobile, Zimmer), whereas 38 men and 12 women (mean age, 67 years) used a conventional prosthesis (Genesis II, Smith & Nephew) that preserves the posterior cruciate ligament, with mobile-bearing polyethylene inlay. The Knee Society knee and functional scores and the range of motion (especially maximum passive flexion) were assessed. Radiographs were evaluated to identify radiolucent lines at the bone cement interface, patella tracking, tibiofemoral alignment, and implant positioning.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 68 (range, 51- 70) months. In terms of the mean Knee Society scores and range of motion, the difference between groups was not significant (p>0.05), but the improvement in both groups after TKA was significant (p<0.005). Respectively in the high-flexion and conventional TKA groups, 2 and one of the patients developed deep vein thrombosis and were treated with anticoagulants for 3 months. One and 5 of the patients had an unsatisfactory range of motion (<60º) in week 1, which was resolved with mobilisation under general anaesthesia in combination with a peridural catheter for analgesia. No patient developed implant-specific complications such as aseptic loosening (osteolysis, progressive radiolucent lines, implant deviation) or dislocation of the polyethylene insert.

CONCLUSION

The high-flexion prosthesis revealed no significant advantages over the conventional prosthesis in terms of the Knee Society scores and range of motion. Long-term studies are needed to determine whether the high-flexion implant is superior to the conventional implant in terms of polyethylene wear and aseptic loosening.

摘要

目的

比较高屈曲度假体与传统假体的中期疗效。

方法

回顾了由同一位外科医生为107例因原发性骨关节炎接受全膝关节置换术(TKA)的连续患者的记录。21名男性和36名女性(平均年龄65岁)使用了高屈曲度假体(NexGen CR-Flex Mobile,捷迈公司),而38名男性和12名女性(平均年龄67岁)使用了保留后交叉韧带的传统假体(Genesis II,施乐辉公司),带有活动衬垫聚乙烯内植入物。评估了膝关节协会的膝关节和功能评分以及活动范围(尤其是最大被动屈曲度)。对X线片进行评估,以确定骨水泥界面处的透亮线、髌骨轨迹、胫股对线和植入物位置。

结果

平均随访期为68(范围51 - 70)个月。在膝关节协会平均评分和活动范围方面,两组之间差异不显著(p>0.05),但TKA后两组的改善均显著(p<0.005)。在高屈曲度TKA组和传统TKA组中,分别有2例和1例患者发生深静脉血栓形成,并接受了3个月的抗凝治疗。1例和5例患者在第1周时活动范围不满意(<60°),通过全身麻醉下的活动并结合硬膜外导管镇痛得以解决。没有患者出现植入物特异性并发症,如无菌性松动(骨溶解、进行性透亮线、植入物移位)或聚乙烯衬垫脱位。

结论

在膝关节协会评分和活动范围方面,高屈曲度假体相对于传统假体没有显著优势。需要进行长期研究以确定高屈曲度植入物在聚乙烯磨损和无菌性松动方面是否优于传统植入物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验