Adigüzel Ozkan, Yiğit-Özer Senem, Kaya Sadullah, Uysal İbrahim, Ganidağli-Ayaz Selengül, Akkuş Zeki
Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Dec;112(6):803-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.038. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
The aim of this study was to investigate the cleaning ability of a self-adjusting file (SAF) system regarding debris and smear layer removal using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or MTAD.
In total, 45 maxillary incisor teeth were randomly divided into 2 different irrigation groups of 20 canals each and a negative control group of 5 canals. The canals in each of the irrigation groups were irrigated using sodium hypochlorite (1.3%) as an initial irrigant during the first 2 minutes of operation, followed by 2 minutes continuous irrigation with either 17% EDTA or MTAD in a closed system. The negative control group was irrigated using 1.3% sodium hypochlorite. The roots were split longitudinally and subjected to scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The presence of debris and smear layer in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the canal was evaluated using a 5-grade scoring system with ×200 and ×2,000 magnification, respectively.
The SAF operation with 2-minute continuous irrigation using MTAD resulted in root canal walls that were free of smear layer in 85%, 70%, and 60% and of debris in 95%, 90%, and 95% of the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the root canals, respectively. The SAF operation with continuous irrigation using EDTA resulted in root canal walls that were free of smear layer in 85%, 60%, and 50% and of debris in 95%, 90%, and 85% of the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the root canals, respectively. Teeth in the negative control group were totally covered with debris. Evaluation by SEM showed no significant difference between the tested irrigants in removing the smear layer and debris among the different regions of the root canal. Both groups were significantly different from the negative control group.
When using the SAF, the protocols used in this study were effective for debridement for all regions of the root canal even for the apical thirds.
本研究旨在探讨自调式锉(SAF)系统使用乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)或MTAD去除碎屑和玷污层的清洁能力。
总共45颗上颌切牙被随机分为2个不同的冲洗组,每组20个根管,以及1个含5个根管的阴性对照组。在操作的前2分钟,每个冲洗组的根管均使用次氯酸钠(1.3%)作为初始冲洗液,随后在封闭系统中用17% EDTA或MTAD持续冲洗2分钟。阴性对照组用1.3%次氯酸钠冲洗。将牙根纵向劈开并进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查。分别使用5级评分系统,在×200和×2000放大倍数下评估根管冠部、中部和根尖三分之一处碎屑和玷污层的存在情况。
使用MTAD持续冲洗2分钟的SAF操作使根管壁在根管冠部、中部和根尖三分之一处分别有85%、70%和60%无玷污层,95%、90%和95%无碎屑。使用EDTA持续冲洗的SAF操作使根管壁在根管冠部、中部和根尖三分之一处分别有85%、60%和50%无玷污层,95%、90%和85%无碎屑。阴性对照组的牙齿完全被碎屑覆盖。SEM评估显示,在去除根管不同区域的玷污层和碎屑方面,受试冲洗液之间无显著差异。两组与阴性对照组均有显著差异。
使用SAF时,本研究中使用的方案对根管所有区域(甚至根尖三分之一处)的清创均有效。