Chagas Paula S C, Mancini Marisa C, Tirado Marcella G A, Megale Luiz, Sampaio Rosana F
Physical Therapy Department of Elderly, Adult, Maternal and Infant, School of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011 Aug-Sep;15(4):303-9. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552011005000015. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
To understand the opinion of the parents about the baby walker and compare the age of gait acquisition between infants that used a walker and those that did not.
In this quali-quantitative study, an interview involving a semi-structured questionnaire was carried out with 26 parents, 14 of whose infants used the equipment (BWG) and 12 of whose infants did not (NBWG) prior to gait acquisition. After extensive content analysis, categories for interpreting the results emerged. For data triangulation, the age of gait acquisition was documented by weekly telephone contact. Student's t-test was used for comparison between groups with a significance level of α=0.05.
The following categories were identified in the parents' reports: a) information about the baby walker; b) doubt/decision to use it vs. certainty about not using it; c) beliefs about the use of a baby-walker; and d) benefits and harm from use. The age of independent gait acquisition did not differ between groups (p=0.837): BWG initiated gait at 376.17 (SD=32.62) days and NBWG did so at 378.75 (SD=27.99) days.
The beliefs and feelings that permeate the decision to use a baby walker illustrate the different rationales adopted by parents about the role of this equipment in the child's development of gait and autonomy. The use of a baby walker did not influence the age of gait acquisition. The results broaden the understanding of choices that influence child-rearing practices prior to gait acquisition.
了解家长对婴儿学步车的看法,并比较使用学步车的婴儿和未使用学步车的婴儿开始行走的年龄。
在这项定性与定量相结合的研究中,对26位家长进行了访谈,访谈采用半结构化问卷,其中14位家长的婴儿在开始行走前使用了该设备(BWG),12位家长的婴儿未使用(NBWG)。经过广泛的内容分析,得出了解释结果的类别。为了进行数据三角验证,通过每周电话联系记录开始行走的年龄。使用学生t检验对两组进行比较,显著性水平α = 0.05。
在家长报告中确定了以下类别:a)关于婴儿学步车的信息;b)使用它的疑问/决定与确定不使用它;c)关于使用婴儿学步车的信念;d)使用的益处和危害。两组之间独立行走的年龄没有差异(p = 0.837):BWG组在376.17(标准差 = 32.62)天开始行走,NBWG组在378.75(标准差 = 27.99)天开始行走。
影响是否使用婴儿学步车这一决定的信念和感受,说明了家长对于该设备在儿童行走和自主能力发展中所起作用采取的不同理由。使用婴儿学步车并未影响开始行走的年龄。这些结果拓宽了对影响儿童开始行走前养育方式选择的理解。