Horvath Ryan J., Romero-Sandoval Edgar Alfonso, De Leo Joyce A.
Opioids are among the most potent analgesic agents available for acute and post-surgical analgesia. Despite a lack of efficacy in many pain syndromes, their use in the treatment of chronic pain has increased dramatically. Long-term analgesia for those patients for whom opioids are initially effective is limited by side effects. Short-term side effects include respiratory depression, constipation, nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, pruritus, and myoclonus. These side effects range from mild, as with constipation, which can lead to poor patient compliance but can be mitigated pharmacologically, to severe, as with respiratory depression, which is the leading cause of death in opioid toxicity. Long-term side effects include analgesic tolerance, hyperalgesia (enhanced pain perception), hormonal imbalance, and immune modulation (Ballantyne and Mao 2003). It is now the standard of care to prescribe testosterone replacement for male patients and monitor all patients for immune suppression throughout long-term opioid therapy. Currently there are no effective strategies to reduce tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia, which are thought to be the cause of failed long-term analgesia (Ballantyne 2007). The clinical use of opioids has increased dramatically over the past 20 years with increased recognition of the under-treatment of chronic pain and better marketing by pharmaceutical companies (Cicero, Inciardi, and Munoz 2005; Joranson et al. 2000). A salient example of this trend was the increase in the off-label use of the non-opioid gabapentin (Neurontin) for chronic pain treatment, which was driven by misinformation and false claims (Landefeld and Steinman 2009). Portenoy and Foley (1986) were the first to report on the efficacy of opioid therapy for chronic, non-malignant pain. Their retrospective case study of 38 patients found that low-dose (<20 mg per day for most patients) opioids provided adequate analgesia in a majority of cases. However, opioid treatment did not improve employment or social function. Based largely upon this landmark study, the medical use of prescription opioids increased dramatically. From 1990 to 1996, the medical use of opioids including morphine, fentanyl, and oxycodone rose by an astounding 59%, 1168%, and 23%, respectively (Joranson et al. 2000). It was not until 1997, however, that national guidelines for the expanded use of opioid analgesics to treat chronic pain were published by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the American Pain Society (Anesthesiology 1997; Pain 1997). Following the publication of these guidelines, from 1997 to 2001 the therapeutic use of morphine, fentanyl, and oxycodone increased still further by 48.8%, 151.2%, and 347.9%, respectively. The diversion, misuse, and abuse of opioids have mirrored the increase in opioid prescriptions. From 1997 to 2001 there was an increase in the abuse of morphine-containing compounds by 161.8%, fentanyl-containing compounds by 249.8%, and oxycodone-containing compounds by 267.3% (Novak, Nemeth, and Lawson 2004). Much of this increase in the abuse of opioids is thought to be due to the increased availability of prescription opioids and the popular misconception that prescription drugs are less dangerous than non-regulated, illegal “street” drugs. The diversion and misuse of opioids has become a critical issue in their therapeutic use (Ballantyne and LaForge 2007). The alarming increase in the amount of opioids being prescribed and the ever-increasing misuse and abuse of opioids has led to the generation of new guidelines for their use (Pergolizzi et al. 2008; Trescot et al. 2008). These updated guidelines highlight many recent studies that have shown that opioids prescribed for chronic pain may be effective for short-term analgesia (Portenoy and Foley 1986) but are of indeterminate or highly variable effectiveness for long-term (>6 months) treatment. Much of this variability is due to the differences in the pain populations studied, the wide dosage ranges of opioids currently being prescribed for chronic pain (from 20 to >100 mg morphine equivalents per day), and non-uniformity in the outcomes measured (Ballantyne and Shin 2008). Limited opioid efficacy, increasing diversion and misuse, and side effects are key problems in the treatment of chronic pain. These clinical realities and insights from preclinical investigation highlight the need for the development of new analgesic agents that target non-opioid based mechanisms that include other cell types and interactions beyond neuronal actions.
阿片类药物是用于急性和术后镇痛的最有效的镇痛剂之一。尽管在许多疼痛综合征中缺乏疗效,但它们在慢性疼痛治疗中的使用却急剧增加。对于那些最初使用阿片类药物有效的患者,长期镇痛受到副作用的限制。短期副作用包括呼吸抑制、便秘、恶心和呕吐、尿潴留、瘙痒和肌阵挛。这些副作用程度不一,像便秘这种轻度副作用,虽会导致患者依从性差,但可通过药物缓解;而呼吸抑制这种严重副作用,则是阿片类药物中毒死亡的主要原因。长期副作用包括镇痛耐受性、痛觉过敏(疼痛感知增强)、激素失衡和免疫调节(巴兰坦和毛,2003年)。现在的治疗标准是为男性患者开具睾酮替代药物,并在长期阿片类药物治疗期间监测所有患者的免疫抑制情况。目前,尚无有效的策略来降低耐受性和阿片类药物引起的痛觉过敏,而这被认为是长期镇痛失败的原因(巴兰坦,2007年)。在过去20年里,随着对慢性疼痛治疗不足的认识增加以及制药公司更好的营销,阿片类药物的临床使用急剧增加(西塞罗、因恰尔迪和穆尼奥斯,2005年;乔兰森等人,2000年)。这种趋势的一个显著例子是,非阿片类药物加巴喷丁(Neurontin)用于慢性疼痛治疗的标签外使用增加,这是由错误信息和虚假声明推动的(兰德费尔德和斯坦曼,2009年)。波滕诺伊和福利(1986年)首次报告了阿片类药物治疗慢性非恶性疼痛的疗效。他们对38名患者的回顾性病例研究发现,低剂量(大多数患者每天<20毫克)阿片类药物在大多数情况下能提供足够的镇痛效果。然而,阿片类药物治疗并未改善就业或社会功能。很大程度上基于这项具有里程碑意义的研究,处方阿片类药物的医疗用途急剧增加。从1990年到1996年,包括吗啡、芬太尼和羟考酮在内的阿片类药物的医疗使用量分别惊人地增长了59%、1168%和23%(乔兰森等人,2000年)。然而,直到1997年,美国麻醉医师协会和美国疼痛协会才发布了关于扩大使用阿片类镇痛药治疗慢性疼痛的国家指南(《麻醉学》,1997年;《疼痛》,1997年)。这些指南发布后,从1997年到2001年,吗啡、芬太尼和羟考酮的治疗用量又分别进一步增加了48.8%、151.2%和347.9%。阿片类药物的转移、滥用和误用与阿片类药物处方的增加同步。从1997年到2001年,含吗啡化合物的滥用增加了161.8%,含芬太尼化合物增加了249.8%,含羟考酮化合物增加了267.3%(诺瓦克、内梅斯和劳森,2004年)。阿片类药物滥用的这种增加很大程度上被认为是由于处方阿片类药物的可获得性增加以及普遍存在的误解,即处方药比不受监管的非法“街头”毒品危险性小。阿片类药物的转移和误用已成为其治疗使用中的一个关键问题(巴兰坦和拉福奇,2007年)。阿片类药物处方量的惊人增加以及对阿片类药物误用和滥用的不断增加,导致了关于其使用的新指南的产生(佩尔戈利齐等人,2008年;特雷斯考特等人,2008年)。这些更新后的指南强调了许多最近的研究,这些研究表明,为慢性疼痛开具的阿片类药物可能对短期镇痛有效(波滕诺伊和福利,1986年),但对长期(>6个月)治疗的有效性不确定或差异很大。这种差异很大程度上是由于所研究的疼痛人群不同、目前为慢性疼痛开具的阿片类药物剂量范围很广(每天20至>100毫克吗啡当量)以及所测量结果的不一致性(巴兰坦和申,2008年)。阿片类药物疗效有限、转移和误用增加以及副作用是慢性疼痛治疗中的关键问题。这些临床现实以及临床前研究的见解凸显了开发新的镇痛剂的必要性,这些镇痛剂靶向基于非阿片类药物的机制,包括除神经元作用之外的其他细胞类型和相互作用。