Suppr超能文献

下颈椎关节疼痛对活动范围及屈伸旋转试验解读的影响。

The influence of lower cervical joint pain on range of motion and interpretation of the flexion-rotation test.

作者信息

Hall Toby, Briffa Kathy, Hopper Diana

机构信息

School of Physiotherapy, Curtin Innovation Health Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

J Man Manip Ther. 2010 Sep;18(3):126-31. doi: 10.1179/106698110X12640740712293.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of lower cervical facet joint pain (CFP) on the flexion-rotation test (FRT).

METHODS

A single blind, comparative group design was used to investigate whether lower CFP influences FRT mobility and examiner interpretation. Twenty-four subjects were evaluated, 12 with cervicogenic headache (age 26-63 years) and 12 with lower CFP (age 44-62 years), confirmed by therapeutic cervical facet joint intervention. A single blinded examiner conducted the FRT, reporting the test state (positive or negative) before measuring range of motion using a goniometer. Subjects with lower CFP were evaluated by the FRT prior to therapeutic intervention and were excluded from analysis if they did not gain complete symptomatic relief following the procedure. Only subjects with immediate complete relief were included.

RESULTS

The average range of unilateral rotation to the limited side during the FRT was 26 and 37.5° for the cervicogenic headache and lower CFP groups respectively. The difference between groups was significant (P<0.01). Sensitivity and specificity for cervicogenic headache diagnosis was 75 and 92% respectively. A receiver operating curve revealed that an experienced examiner using the FRT was able to make the correct diagnosis 90% of the time (P<0.01), with a positive cut-off value of 32°.

DISCUSSION

These findings provide further evidence for the clinical utility of the FRT in cervical examination and cervicogenic headache diagnosis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨下颈椎小关节疼痛(CFP)对屈伸旋转试验(FRT)的影响。

方法

采用单盲、对比组设计,以研究下颈椎CFP是否会影响FRT的活动度及检查者的判断。对24名受试者进行了评估,其中12名患有颈源性头痛(年龄26 - 63岁),12名患有下颈椎CFP(年龄44 - 62岁),均经颈椎小关节治疗性干预确诊。由一名单盲检查者进行FRT,在使用角度计测量活动范围之前报告试验结果(阳性或阴性)。下颈椎CFP患者在治疗性干预前接受FRT评估,若术后未获得完全症状缓解则被排除在分析之外。仅纳入立即获得完全缓解的患者。

结果

在FRT期间,颈源性头痛组和下颈椎CFP组向受限侧的单侧平均旋转范围分别为26°和37.5°。两组间差异显著(P<0.01)。颈源性头痛诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为75%和92%。一条受试者工作特征曲线显示,经验丰富的检查者使用FRT时,90%的情况下能够做出正确诊断(P<0.01),阳性截断值为32°。

讨论

这些发现为FRT在颈椎检查和颈源性头痛诊断中的临床应用提供了进一步的证据。

相似文献

1
The influence of lower cervical joint pain on range of motion and interpretation of the flexion-rotation test.
J Man Manip Ther. 2010 Sep;18(3):126-31. doi: 10.1179/106698110X12640740712293.
2
Comparative analysis and diagnostic accuracy of the cervical flexion-rotation test.
J Headache Pain. 2010 Oct;11(5):391-7. doi: 10.1007/s10194-010-0222-3. Epub 2010 May 28.
3
Intertester reliability and diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion-rotation test.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 May;31(4):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.03.012.
6
Long-term stability and minimal detectable change of the cervical flexion-rotation test.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Apr;40(4):225-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3100.
7
The diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion-rotation test in C1/2-related cervicogenic headache.
Man Ther. 2007 Aug;12(3):256-62. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.06.016. Epub 2006 Nov 16.
8
Upper cervical range of rotation during the flexion-rotation test is age dependent: an observational study.
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2020 Oct 31;12:1759720X20964139. doi: 10.1177/1759720X20964139. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

2
Association between age, sex and cervical and upper cervical rotation tests. Descriptive and correlational study in healthy volunteers.
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023 Apr 29;14:20406223231170158. doi: 10.1177/20406223231170158. eCollection 2023.
3
Effects of SNAG mobilization combined with a self-SNAG home-exercise for the treatment of cervicogenic headache: a pilot study.
J Man Manip Ther. 2021 Aug;29(4):244-254. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1864960. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
8
Manual examination in the diagnosis of cervicogenic headache: a systematic literature review.
J Man Manip Ther. 2015 Sep;23(4):210-8. doi: 10.1179/2042618614Y.0000000097.
10
Is there a difference in head posture and cervical spine movement in children with and without pediatric headache?
Eur J Pediatr. 2013 Oct;172(10):1349-56. doi: 10.1007/s00431-013-2046-z. Epub 2013 May 26.

本文引用的文献

1
The relationship between cervicogenic headache and impairment determined by the flexion-rotation test.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Nov-Dec;33(9):666-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.09.002. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
3
Comparative analysis and diagnostic accuracy of the cervical flexion-rotation test.
J Headache Pain. 2010 Oct;11(5):391-7. doi: 10.1007/s10194-010-0222-3. Epub 2010 May 28.
4
Long-term stability and minimal detectable change of the cervical flexion-rotation test.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Apr;40(4):225-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3100.
5
Clinical evaluation of cervicogenic headache: a clinical perspective.
J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(2):73-80. doi: 10.1179/106698108790818422.
6
Intertester reliability and diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion-rotation test.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 May;31(4):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.03.012.
8
The diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion-rotation test in C1/2-related cervicogenic headache.
Man Ther. 2007 Aug;12(3):256-62. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.06.016. Epub 2006 Nov 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验