NewYork Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York 10021, USA.
Annu Rev Med. 2012;63:465-77. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-061410-121850. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
Relationships between physicians and industry are prevalent in medical education, clinical practice, and research, as well as at the level of medical institutions. These relationships can be valuable for the advancement of medicine but have also received increased scrutiny in recent years because they create conflicts of interest that pose a risk of biasing the judgments of physicians. Responses to these conflicts of interest by medical institutions, journals, and governments have utilized four main tools: education, disclosure, management, and prohibition. Each of the four has its advantages and drawbacks. Medicine faces the challenge of tailoring the use of these tools to minimize the risk of bias while allowing useful medical-industry collaborations to proceed. Viewing the dilemmas created by physicians' relationships with industry as a version of the principal-agent problem, which is much discussed by economists, may help in developing creative approaches to these issues.
在医学教育、临床实践和研究以及医疗机构层面,医生与行业之间的关系普遍存在。这些关系对于医学的发展可能很有价值,但近年来也受到了更多的审查,因为它们产生了利益冲突,有可能使医生的判断产生偏差。医疗机构、期刊和政府对这些利益冲突的回应利用了四种主要工具:教育、披露、管理和禁止。这四种工具各有优缺点。医学面临的挑战是调整这些工具的使用,以将偏见的风险降到最低,同时允许有益的医学-工业合作继续进行。将医生与行业关系所产生的困境视为经济学家经常讨论的委托代理问题的一种版本,可能有助于为这些问题开发创造性的方法。