University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute with Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Nov;20(11):2429-37. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0520. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
Germline variation in DNA damage response may explain variable treatment outcomes in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). By grouping patients according to stage and radiation treatment, we compared SCCHN survival with regard to ERCC2 A35931C (Lys751Gln, rs13181) and CCND1 G870A (Pro241Pro, rs9344) genotypes.
In a hospital-based SCCHN case series (all white, 24.7% female, mean age 58.4 years), this treatment-outcome cohort study genotyped 275 stage III-IV cases that were initially treated with radiation (with or without chemotherapy) and 80 stage III-IV and 130 stage I-II cases that were initially treated without radiation or chemotherapy and used Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses to compare genotype groups on the basis of overall, disease-specific, progression-free, and recurrence-free survival rates.
ERCC2 35931 AA predicted worse survival in stage III-IV cases treated with radiation [multiply-adjusted HR = 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-2.40; HR over the first 3 follow-up years = 1.92; 95% CI, 1.28-2.88] and better survival in stage III-IV cases not treated with radiation (HR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11-0.62). Although not associated with survival in stage III-IV cancers treated with radiation (HR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.67-1.51), CCND1-870 GG predicted better survival in stage III-IV cancers not treated with radiation (HR = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.50). Survival in stage I-II did not depend on ERCC2 A35931C or CCND1 G870A genotype.
Although promoting tumor progression in untreated patients, germline differences in DNA-repair or cell-cycle control may improve treatment outcome in patients treated with DNA-damaging agents.
ERCC2 A35931C may help distinguish advanced stage SCCHN with better outcomes from radiation treatment.
DNA 损伤反应中的种系变异可能解释了头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCCHN)的治疗结果存在差异。通过根据阶段和放射治疗对患者进行分组,我们比较了 ERCC2 A35931C(Lys751Gln,rs13181)和 CCND1 G870A(Pro241Pro,rs9344)基因型与 SCCHN 生存的关系。
在一项基于医院的 SCCHN 病例系列研究(均为白人,24.7%为女性,平均年龄 58.4 岁)中,我们对 275 例 III-IV 期接受放射治疗(放化疗或单纯放疗)的病例和 80 例 III-IV 期、130 例 I-II 期的病例进行了治疗结局队列研究,这些病例最初未接受放疗或化疗,并采用 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 回归分析比较了基于总生存率、疾病特异性生存率、无进展生存率和无复发生存率的基因型组。
在接受放疗的 III-IV 期病例中,ERCC2 35931AA 预测生存率较差[多因素调整 HR=1.66,95%置信区间(CI)为 1.15-2.40;前 3 年随访的 HR=1.92;95%CI 为 1.28-2.88],而在未接受放疗的 III-IV 期病例中,ERCC2 35931AA 预测生存率较好(HR=0.26;95%CI 为 0.11-0.62)。尽管在接受放疗的 III-IV 期癌症患者中,CCND1-870GG 与生存率无关(HR=1.00;95%CI 为 0.67-1.51),但在未接受放疗的 III-IV 期癌症患者中,CCND1-870GG 预测生存率较好(HR=0.14;95%CI 为 0.04-0.50)。I-II 期的生存情况与 ERCC2 A35931C 或 CCND1 G870A 基因型无关。
尽管在未接受治疗的患者中促进肿瘤进展,但 DNA 修复或细胞周期控制的种系差异可能改善接受 DNA 损伤剂治疗的患者的治疗结果。
ERCC2 A35931C 可能有助于区分接受放疗的晚期 SCCHN 患者中治疗效果较好的患者。