Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Jun;22(3):418-22. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr107. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
Socio-economic inequalities in breast cancer survival have been reported worldwide, but whether these exist in screen detected as well as symptomatic women has not been established. Making this distinction will allow inferences about the relative contributions of pre- and post-diagnostic delay to these inequalities.
Screening-eligible women diagnosed with breast cancer in South West England (2002-06) were followed-up to 2007. Five-year relative survival ratios (RSRs) were calculated for each deprivation quintile, using deprivation-specific life-tables and a period approach. The 'deprivation gap' in survival was calculated as the slope index of inequality between least and most deprived women.
The study included 11 018 women, of whom 1176 died during follow-up. Screening status of 54% of women was missing. A clear gradient in survival across deprivation groups ranged from 83.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 80.0, 86.6] in the most deprived to 90.8% (95% CI 89.0, 92.3) in the least deprived group. Comparing the most deprived to least deprived women, the estimated deprivation gap was -9.42% (95% CI -12.80, -6.04, P = 0.003). Among screen-detected women, inequalities were attenuated, but persisted, ranging from 95.6% (95% CI 90.6, 98.0) in the most deprived to 98.2% (95% CI 95.9, 99.2) in least deprived; the estimated deprivation gap was -3.03% (95% CI -5.75, -0.85, P = 0.023).
The deprivation gap in survival does not appear as marked with screen-detected breast cancer as the other groups, though still apparent. Efforts to eliminate inequalities should consider both increasing breast screening participation and ensuring equal access through secondary care systems for women of lower socio-economic position.
全球范围内都有报道称乳腺癌生存存在社会经济不平等现象,但尚未确定这些现象是否存在于筛查发现的女性和有症状的女性中。区分这一点将可以推断出,在这些不平等现象中,诊断前和诊断后延迟的相对贡献。
在英格兰西南部(2002-06 年)被诊断患有乳腺癌且符合筛查条件的女性进行了随访,随访至 2007 年。使用特定于贫困的生命表和时期方法,为每个贫困五分位数计算了五年相对生存率(RSR)。生存的“贫困差距”是通过计算最贫困和最富裕妇女之间不平等的斜率指数来计算的。
研究纳入了 11018 名女性,其中 1176 名在随访期间死亡。54%的女性的筛查情况缺失。在贫困人群中,生存状况存在明显的梯度,从最贫困的人群(83.6%[95%可信区间(CI)80.0-86.6])到最富裕的人群(90.8%[95% CI 89.0-92.3])。与最贫困的女性相比,最富裕的女性估计的贫困差距为-9.42%(95%CI-12.80,-6.04,P=0.003)。在筛查发现的女性中,不平等程度有所减弱,但仍然存在,从最贫困的人群(95.6%[95%CI 90.6-98.0])到最富裕的人群(98.2%[95%CI 95.9-99.2]);估计的贫困差距为-3.03%(95%CI-5.75,-0.85,P=0.023)。
与其他人群相比,筛查发现的乳腺癌生存的贫困差距并不明显,但仍然存在。消除不平等现象的努力应同时考虑增加乳腺癌筛查的参与度,并通过二级保健系统确保社会经济地位较低的女性平等获得机会。