• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险管理式医疗和初级保健质量:跨州考察种族/民族的影响。

Medicare managed care and primary care quality: examining racial/ethnic effects across states.

机构信息

Center for Primary care, Prevention, and Clinical Partnerships Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Manag Sci. 2012 Mar;15(1):15-28. doi: 10.1007/s10729-011-9176-5. Epub 2011 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10729-011-9176-5
PMID:21892596
Abstract

The study assesses the role of Medicare Advantage (MA) plans in providing quality primary care in comparison to FFS Medicare in three states, New York, California, Florida, across three racial ethnic groups. The performance is measured in terms of providing better quality primary care, as defined by lowering the risks of preventable hospital admissions. Using 2004 hospital discharge data (HCUP-SID) of Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality for three states, a multivariate cross sectional design is used with individual admission as the unit of analysis. The study found that MA plans were associated with lower preventable hospitalizations relative to marker admissions. The benefit also spilled over to different racial and ethnic subgroups and in some states, e.g. CA and FL, MA enrollment was associated with significantly lower odds of minority admissions than of white admissions. These results may indicate a potentially favorable role of MA plans in attenuating racial/ethnic inequalities in primary care in some states.

摘要

本研究评估了医疗保险优势计划(MA)在三个州(纽约、加利福尼亚、佛罗里达)的三种种族群体中提供优质初级保健服务的作用,与传统的医疗保险相比。表现是通过降低可预防住院的风险来衡量的,以提供更好的初级保健质量为定义。使用 2004 年三个州的医疗机构资源利用率调查(HCUP-SID)的医疗机构资源利用率调查数据,采用个体入院为分析单位的多变量横截面设计。研究发现,与标志物入院相比,MA 计划与较低的可预防住院率相关。这种好处也扩展到不同的种族和族裔亚组,并且在某些州,例如加利福尼亚州和佛罗里达州,MA 计划的参与与少数民族入院的可能性显著低于白人入院的可能性相关。这些结果可能表明 MA 计划在某些州减轻初级保健中种族/族裔不平等方面可能发挥了有利作用。

相似文献

1
Medicare managed care and primary care quality: examining racial/ethnic effects across states.医疗保险管理式医疗和初级保健质量:跨州考察种族/民族的影响。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2012 Mar;15(1):15-28. doi: 10.1007/s10729-011-9176-5. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
2
Medicare managed care plan performance: a comparison across hospitalization types.医疗保险管理式医疗计划绩效:不同住院类型的比较
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2012 Jan 15;2(1). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.002.01.a02. eCollection 2012.
3
Do Experiences with Medicare Managed Care Vary According to the Proportion of Same-Race/Ethnicity/Language Individuals Enrolled in One's Contract?医疗保险管理式医疗的体验是否会因合同中同种族/民族/语言个体的参保比例而有所不同?
Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct;50(5):1649-87. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12292. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
4
How do the experiences of Medicare beneficiary subgroups differ between managed care and original Medicare?医疗保险受益人群亚组在管理式医疗和原始医疗保险之间的体验有何不同?
Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug;46(4):1039-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01245.x. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
5
Reporting CAHPS and HEDIS data by race/ethnicity for Medicare beneficiaries.报告医疗保险受益人的 CAHPS 和 HEDIS 数据按种族/族裔划分。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr;48(2 Pt 1):417-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01452.x. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
6
Do HMOs reduce preventable hospitalizations for Medicare beneficiaries?健康维护组织(HMOs)是否能减少医疗保险受益人的可预防住院情况?
Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Oct;64(5):544-67. doi: 10.1177/1077558707301955.
7
Comparison of the Quality of Hospitals That Admit Medicare Advantage Patients vs Traditional Medicare Patients.比较收治医疗保险优势计划患者和传统医疗保险患者的医院质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919310. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19310.
8
The impact of Medicaid managed care on hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.医疗补助管理式医疗对门诊治疗敏感型疾病住院率的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Feb;40(1):19-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00340.x.
9
Comparing post-acute rehabilitation use, length of stay, and outcomes experienced by Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with hip fracture in the United States: A secondary analysis of administrative data.比较美国 Medicare 按服务收费和 Medicare Advantage 受益人与髋部骨折相关的康复使用、住院时间和康复结局:基于行政数据的二次分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jun 26;15(6):e1002592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002592. eCollection 2018 Jun.
10
Differences in Hospitalizations Between Fee-for-Service and Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.服务收费制和医疗保险优势计划受益人之间的住院差异。
Med Care. 2019 Jan;57(1):8-12. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001000.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: an observational study of medicare advantage and fee-for-service beneficiaries.微创结直肠癌手术:医疗保险优势和按服务收费受益人的观察性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6800-6811. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11168-0. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
2
Gaps In Quality Of Care Not Consistent Between Traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage For Racial And Ethnic Groups.不同种族和族裔群体的传统 Medicare 和 Medicare Advantage 在医疗质量上存在差距。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Mar;43(3):381-390. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00428.
3
Evaluation of Potentially Avoidable Acute Care Utilization Among Patients Insured by Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of local resources on hospitalization patterns of Medicare beneficiaries and propensity to travel outside local markets.当地资源对 Medicare 受益人的住院模式和向当地市场以外地区流动的倾向的影响。
J Rural Health. 2010 Winter;26(1):20-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00261.x.
2
Do HMOs reduce preventable hospitalizations for Medicare beneficiaries?健康维护组织(HMOs)是否能减少医疗保险受益人的可预防住院情况?
Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Oct;64(5):544-67. doi: 10.1177/1077558707301955.
3
Medicare preferred provider organization demonstration: plan offerings and beneficiary enrollment.
评估医疗保险优势计划与传统医疗保险覆盖的患者中潜在可避免的急性护理利用情况。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Feb 3;4(2):e225530. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5530.
4
Post-SNF outcomes and cost comparison: Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare.术后护理机构(SNF)后结局和成本比较:医疗保险优势计划与传统医疗保险。
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Apr;27(4):140-146. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88616.
5
Mortality Differences Between Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage: A Risk-Adjusted Assessment Using Claims Data.传统医疗保险与医疗保险优势计划之间的死亡率差异:使用理赔数据进行的风险调整评估
Inquiry. 2017 Jan 1;54:46958017709103. doi: 10.1177/0046958017709103.
6
Depression and ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic physical conditions.患有慢性身体疾病的医疗保险受益人的抑郁症及非卧床护理敏感型住院情况。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014 Sep-Oct;36(5):460-5. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.05.020. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
7
Beyond black and white: race/ethnicity and health status among older adults.超越黑白之分:老年人中的种族/族裔与健康状况
Am J Manag Care. 2014 Mar;20(3):239-48.
医疗保险优选提供者组织示范项目:计划产品与受益人参保情况
Health Care Financ Rev. 2006 Spring;27(3):95-109.
4
Impact of HMO withdrawals on vulnerable Medicare beneficiaries.健康维护组织退出对脆弱的医疗保险受益人的影响。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2005 Spring;26(3):5-30.
5
A re-examination of distance as a proxy for severity of illness and the implications for differences in utilization by race/ethnicity.重新审视将距离作为疾病严重程度的替代指标以及种族/族裔在医疗利用差异方面的影响。
Health Econ. 2007 Jul;16(7):687-701. doi: 10.1002/hec.1192.
6
Access to health care and hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.获得针对门诊护理敏感病症的医疗保健和住院服务。
Med Care Res Rev. 2006 Dec;63(6):719-41. doi: 10.1177/1077558706293637.
7
Relationship between quality of care and racial disparities in Medicare health plans.医疗保险计划中医疗服务质量与种族差异之间的关系。
JAMA. 2006 Oct 25;296(16):1998-2004. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.16.1998.
8
Spatial analysis of elderly access to primary care services.老年人获得初级保健服务的空间分析。
Int J Health Geogr. 2006 May 15;5:19. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-5-19.
9
Preventable hospitalization and medicaid managed care: does race matter?可预防的住院治疗与医疗补助管理式医疗:种族有影响吗?
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2006 Feb;17(1):101-15. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2006.0018.
10
Trends in the quality of care and racial disparities in Medicare managed care.医疗保险管理式医疗中的医疗质量趋势及种族差异
N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 18;353(7):692-700. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa051207.