Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Oct;90(4):532-41. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.175. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
Stem cell therapy has emerged as a potential therapeutic strategy for myocardial infarction (MI). Multiple cell types used to regenerate the injured heart have been tested in clinical trials. The results of studies of skeletal myoblasts (SKMs) have been resoundingly negative, and the bone marrow-derived-cell experience leaves much to be desired. A number of lessons arise from the large-scale bone marrow-derived-cell trials: (i) efficacy has been inconsistent and, overall, modest; however, unexpectedly meaningful benefits on clinical end points have been reported; (ii) cardiac engraftment of cells is disappointingly low, and delivery methods need to be optimized and combined with strategies to boost retention; (iii) the cardiomyogenic potential of bone marrow cells is low; however, functional benefit can be achieved through indirect pathways; and (iv) autologous cell therapy has severe limitations; highly standardized allogeneic cell products are attractive. Given the spotty trajectory of cell therapy to date, a more systematic approach to product development and preclinical optimization will facilitate more effective clinical translation.
干细胞治疗已成为心肌梗死(MI)的一种潜在治疗策略。已经在临床试验中测试了多种用于再生受损心脏的细胞类型。骨骼肌母细胞(SKM)的研究结果令人失望,骨髓来源细胞的经验还有很多不足之处。从大规模的骨髓来源细胞试验中得出了一些经验教训:(i)疗效不一致,总体上适度;但是,出乎意料的是,报告了对临床终点有意义的益处;(ii)细胞的心脏移植率低,需要优化输送方法并结合策略以提高保留率;(iii)骨髓细胞的心肌生成潜力低;但是,可以通过间接途径获得功能益处;(iv)自体细胞疗法有严重的局限性;高度标准化的同种异体细胞产品很有吸引力。鉴于迄今为止细胞治疗的轨迹参差不齐,更系统的产品开发和临床前优化方法将有助于更有效地进行临床转化。